Business Today

business-today-logo
SUBSCRIPTION
ADVERTISE
Menu
  • Home
  • Issues
    • 1996 to 1999
      • 1996
        • May 1996
        • June 1996
        • July 1996
        • August 1996
        • September 1996
        • October 1996
        • November 1996
        • December 1996
      • 1997
        • January 1997
        • FEBRUARY 1997
        • March 1997
        • April 1997
        • May 1997
        • June 1997
        • July 1997
        • August 1997
        • September 1997
        • October 1997
        • November 1997
        • December 1997
    • 2000 to 2009
      • 2006
        • January 2006
        • February 2006
        • March 2006
        • April 2006
        • May 2006
        • June 2006
        • July 2006
        • August 2006
        • September 2006
        • October 2006
        • November 2006
        • December 2006
      • 2007
        • January 2007
        • February 2007
        • March 2007
        • April 2007
        • May 2007
        • July 2007
        • June 2007
        • August 2007
        • September 2007
        • October 2007
        • November 2007
        • December 2007
      • 2008
        • January 2008
        • February 2008
        • March 2008
        • May 2008
        • April 2008
        • June 2008
        • July 2008
        • August 2008
        • September 2008
        • November 2008
        • October 2008
        • December 2008
      • 2009
        • January 2009
        • February 2009
        • March 2009
        • April 2009
        • May 2009
        • June 2009
        • July 2009
        • August 2009
        • September 2009
        • October 2009
        • November 2009
        • December 2009
    • 2010 to 2019
      • 2010
        • January 2010
        • February 2010
        • March 2010
        • April 2010
        • May 2010
        • June 2010
        • July 2010
        • August 2010
        • September 2010
        • October 2010
        • November 2010
        • December 2010
      • 2011
        • January 2011
        • February 2011
        • March 2011
        • April 2011
        • May 2011
        • June 2011
        • July 2011
        • August 2011
        • September 2011
        • October 2011
        • November 2011
        • December 2011
      • 2012
        • January 2012
        • February 2012
        • March 2012
        • April 2012
        • May 2012
        • June 2012
        • July 2012
        • August 2012
        • September 2012
        • October 2012
        • November 2012
        • December 2012
      • 2013
        • January 2013
        • February 2013
        • March 2013
        • April 2013
        • May 2013
        • June 2013
        • July 2013
        • August 2013
        • September 2013
        • October 2013
        • November 2013
        • December 2013
      • 2014
        • January 2014
        • February 2014
        • March 2014
        • April 2014
        • May 2014
        • June 2014
        • July 2014
        • August 2014
        • September 2014
        • October 2014
        • November 2014
        • December 2014
      • 2015
        • January 2015
        • February 2015
        • March 2015
        • April 2015
        • May 2015
        • June 2015
        • July 2015
        • August 2015
        • September 2015
        • October 2015
        • November 2015
        • December 2015
      • 2016
        • January 2016
        • February 2016
        • March 2016
        • April 2016
        • May 2016
        • June 2016
        • July 2016
        • August 2016
        • September 2016
        • October 2016
        • November 2016
        • December 2016
      • 2017
        • January 2017
        • February 2017
        • March 2017
        • April 2017
        • May 2017
        • June 2017
        • July 2017
        • August 2017
        • September 2017
        • October 2017
        • November 2017
        • December 2017
      • 2018
        • January 2018
        • February 2018
        • March 2018
        • April 2018
        • May 2018
        • August 2018
        • June 2018
        • July 2018
        • September 2018
        • October 2018
        • November 2018
        • December 2018
      • 2019
        • January 2019
        • February 2019
        • March 2019
        • April 2019
        • May 2019
        • June 2019
        • July 2019
        • August 2019
        • September 2019
        • October 2019
        • November 2019
        • December 2019
    • 2020 to 2025
      • 2020
        • January 2020
        • February 2020
        • March 2020
        • April 2020
        • May 2020
        • June 2020
        • July 2020
        • August 2020
        • September 2020
        • October 2020
        • November 2020
        • December 2020
      • 2021
        • September 2021
        • October 2021
      • 2022
        • January 2022
        • February 2022
        • March 2022
        • April 2022
        • May 2022
        • June 2022
        • July 2022
        • August 2022
        • September 2022
        • October 2022
        • December 2022
      • 2023
        • January 2023
        • February 2023
        • March 2023
        • April 2023
        • May 2023
        • June 2023
        • July 2023
        • August 2023
        • September 2023
        • October 2023
        • November 2023
        • December 2023
      • 2024
        • January 2024
        • February 2024
        • March 2024
        • April 2024
        • May 2024
        • June 2024
        • July 2024
        • August 2024
        • September 2024
        • October 2024
        • November 2024
        • December 2024
      • 2025
        • January 2025
        • February 2025
        • March 2025
        • April 2025
        • May 2025
  • About Us
  • BT Awards
    • BT Top 40
      • Business Today Top 40 2021 – 2022
    • BT Top 30
      • Business Today Top 30 2015 – 2016
      • Business Today Top 30 2016 – 2017
      • Business Today Top 30 2017 – 2018
      • Business Today Top 30 2018 – 2019
    • BT Top 25
      • Business Today Top 25 2011 – 2012
      • Business Today Top 25 2012 – 2013
      • Business Today Top 25 2013 – 2014
      • Business Today Top 25 2014 – 2015
    • BT Top 20
      • Business Today Top 20 2009 – 2010
      • Business Today Top 20 2010 – 2011
    • BT Top 10
      • Business Today Top 10 2008 – 2009
      • Business Today Top 10 2007 – 2008
      • Business Today Top 10 2006 – 2007
      • Business Today Top 10 2005 – 2006
      • Business Today Top 10 2003 – 2004
      • Business Today Top 10 2000 – 2001
      • Business Today Top 10 1999 – 2000
      • Business Today Top 10 1997 – 1998
      • Business Today Top 10 1996 – 1997
      • Business Today Top 10 1995 – 1996
  • For Digital Subscription
Facebook Instagram
business-today-logo
Menu
  • Home
  • Issues
    • 1996 to 1999
      • 1996
        • May 1996
        • June 1996
        • July 1996
        • August 1996
        • September 1996
        • October 1996
        • November 1996
        • December 1996
      • 1997
        • January 1997
        • FEBRUARY 1997
        • March 1997
        • April 1997
        • May 1997
        • June 1997
        • July 1997
        • August 1997
        • September 1997
        • October 1997
        • November 1997
        • December 1997
    • 2000 to 2009
      • 2006
        • January 2006
        • February 2006
        • March 2006
        • April 2006
        • May 2006
        • June 2006
        • July 2006
        • August 2006
        • September 2006
        • October 2006
        • November 2006
        • December 2006
      • 2007
        • January 2007
        • February 2007
        • March 2007
        • April 2007
        • May 2007
        • July 2007
        • June 2007
        • August 2007
        • September 2007
        • October 2007
        • November 2007
        • December 2007
      • 2008
        • January 2008
        • February 2008
        • March 2008
        • May 2008
        • April 2008
        • June 2008
        • July 2008
        • August 2008
        • September 2008
        • November 2008
        • October 2008
        • December 2008
      • 2009
        • January 2009
        • February 2009
        • March 2009
        • April 2009
        • May 2009
        • June 2009
        • July 2009
        • August 2009
        • September 2009
        • October 2009
        • November 2009
        • December 2009
    • 2010 to 2019
      • 2010
        • January 2010
        • February 2010
        • March 2010
        • April 2010
        • May 2010
        • June 2010
        • July 2010
        • August 2010
        • September 2010
        • October 2010
        • November 2010
        • December 2010
      • 2011
        • January 2011
        • February 2011
        • March 2011
        • April 2011
        • May 2011
        • June 2011
        • July 2011
        • August 2011
        • September 2011
        • October 2011
        • November 2011
        • December 2011
      • 2012
        • January 2012
        • February 2012
        • March 2012
        • April 2012
        • May 2012
        • June 2012
        • July 2012
        • August 2012
        • September 2012
        • October 2012
        • November 2012
        • December 2012
      • 2013
        • January 2013
        • February 2013
        • March 2013
        • April 2013
        • May 2013
        • June 2013
        • July 2013
        • August 2013
        • September 2013
        • October 2013
        • November 2013
        • December 2013
      • 2014
        • January 2014
        • February 2014
        • March 2014
        • April 2014
        • May 2014
        • June 2014
        • July 2014
        • August 2014
        • September 2014
        • October 2014
        • November 2014
        • December 2014
      • 2015
        • January 2015
        • February 2015
        • March 2015
        • April 2015
        • May 2015
        • June 2015
        • July 2015
        • August 2015
        • September 2015
        • October 2015
        • November 2015
        • December 2015
      • 2016
        • January 2016
        • February 2016
        • March 2016
        • April 2016
        • May 2016
        • June 2016
        • July 2016
        • August 2016
        • September 2016
        • October 2016
        • November 2016
        • December 2016
      • 2017
        • January 2017
        • February 2017
        • March 2017
        • April 2017
        • May 2017
        • June 2017
        • July 2017
        • August 2017
        • September 2017
        • October 2017
        • November 2017
        • December 2017
      • 2018
        • January 2018
        • February 2018
        • March 2018
        • April 2018
        • May 2018
        • August 2018
        • June 2018
        • July 2018
        • September 2018
        • October 2018
        • November 2018
        • December 2018
      • 2019
        • January 2019
        • February 2019
        • March 2019
        • April 2019
        • May 2019
        • June 2019
        • July 2019
        • August 2019
        • September 2019
        • October 2019
        • November 2019
        • December 2019
    • 2020 to 2025
      • 2020
        • January 2020
        • February 2020
        • March 2020
        • April 2020
        • May 2020
        • June 2020
        • July 2020
        • August 2020
        • September 2020
        • October 2020
        • November 2020
        • December 2020
      • 2021
        • September 2021
        • October 2021
      • 2022
        • January 2022
        • February 2022
        • March 2022
        • April 2022
        • May 2022
        • June 2022
        • July 2022
        • August 2022
        • September 2022
        • October 2022
        • December 2022
      • 2023
        • January 2023
        • February 2023
        • March 2023
        • April 2023
        • May 2023
        • June 2023
        • July 2023
        • August 2023
        • September 2023
        • October 2023
        • November 2023
        • December 2023
      • 2024
        • January 2024
        • February 2024
        • March 2024
        • April 2024
        • May 2024
        • June 2024
        • July 2024
        • August 2024
        • September 2024
        • October 2024
        • November 2024
        • December 2024
      • 2025
        • January 2025
        • February 2025
        • March 2025
        • April 2025
        • May 2025
  • About Us
  • BT Awards
    • BT Top 40
      • Business Today Top 40 2021 – 2022
    • BT Top 30
      • Business Today Top 30 2015 – 2016
      • Business Today Top 30 2016 – 2017
      • Business Today Top 30 2017 – 2018
      • Business Today Top 30 2018 – 2019
    • BT Top 25
      • Business Today Top 25 2011 – 2012
      • Business Today Top 25 2012 – 2013
      • Business Today Top 25 2013 – 2014
      • Business Today Top 25 2014 – 2015
    • BT Top 20
      • Business Today Top 20 2009 – 2010
      • Business Today Top 20 2010 – 2011
    • BT Top 10
      • Business Today Top 10 2008 – 2009
      • Business Today Top 10 2007 – 2008
      • Business Today Top 10 2006 – 2007
      • Business Today Top 10 2005 – 2006
      • Business Today Top 10 2003 – 2004
      • Business Today Top 10 2000 – 2001
      • Business Today Top 10 1999 – 2000
      • Business Today Top 10 1997 – 1998
      • Business Today Top 10 1996 – 1997
      • Business Today Top 10 1995 – 1996
  • For Digital Subscription
business-today-logo
Menu
  • Home
  • Issues
    • 1996 to 1999
      • 1996
        • May 1996
        • June 1996
        • July 1996
        • August 1996
        • September 1996
        • October 1996
        • November 1996
        • December 1996
      • 1997
        • January 1997
        • FEBRUARY 1997
        • March 1997
        • April 1997
        • May 1997
        • June 1997
        • July 1997
        • August 1997
        • September 1997
        • October 1997
        • November 1997
        • December 1997
    • 2000 to 2009
      • 2006
        • January 2006
        • February 2006
        • March 2006
        • April 2006
        • May 2006
        • June 2006
        • July 2006
        • August 2006
        • September 2006
        • October 2006
        • November 2006
        • December 2006
      • 2007
        • January 2007
        • February 2007
        • March 2007
        • April 2007
        • May 2007
        • July 2007
        • June 2007
        • August 2007
        • September 2007
        • October 2007
        • November 2007
        • December 2007
      • 2008
        • January 2008
        • February 2008
        • March 2008
        • May 2008
        • April 2008
        • June 2008
        • July 2008
        • August 2008
        • September 2008
        • November 2008
        • October 2008
        • December 2008
      • 2009
        • January 2009
        • February 2009
        • March 2009
        • April 2009
        • May 2009
        • June 2009
        • July 2009
        • August 2009
        • September 2009
        • October 2009
        • November 2009
        • December 2009
    • 2010 to 2019
      • 2010
        • January 2010
        • February 2010
        • March 2010
        • April 2010
        • May 2010
        • June 2010
        • July 2010
        • August 2010
        • September 2010
        • October 2010
        • November 2010
        • December 2010
      • 2011
        • January 2011
        • February 2011
        • March 2011
        • April 2011
        • May 2011
        • June 2011
        • July 2011
        • August 2011
        • September 2011
        • October 2011
        • November 2011
        • December 2011
      • 2012
        • January 2012
        • February 2012
        • March 2012
        • April 2012
        • May 2012
        • June 2012
        • July 2012
        • August 2012
        • September 2012
        • October 2012
        • November 2012
        • December 2012
      • 2013
        • January 2013
        • February 2013
        • March 2013
        • April 2013
        • May 2013
        • June 2013
        • July 2013
        • August 2013
        • September 2013
        • October 2013
        • November 2013
        • December 2013
      • 2014
        • January 2014
        • February 2014
        • March 2014
        • April 2014
        • May 2014
        • June 2014
        • July 2014
        • August 2014
        • September 2014
        • October 2014
        • November 2014
        • December 2014
      • 2015
        • January 2015
        • February 2015
        • March 2015
        • April 2015
        • May 2015
        • June 2015
        • July 2015
        • August 2015
        • September 2015
        • October 2015
        • November 2015
        • December 2015
      • 2016
        • January 2016
        • February 2016
        • March 2016
        • April 2016
        • May 2016
        • June 2016
        • July 2016
        • August 2016
        • September 2016
        • October 2016
        • November 2016
        • December 2016
      • 2017
        • January 2017
        • February 2017
        • March 2017
        • April 2017
        • May 2017
        • June 2017
        • July 2017
        • August 2017
        • September 2017
        • October 2017
        • November 2017
        • December 2017
      • 2018
        • January 2018
        • February 2018
        • March 2018
        • April 2018
        • May 2018
        • August 2018
        • June 2018
        • July 2018
        • September 2018
        • October 2018
        • November 2018
        • December 2018
      • 2019
        • January 2019
        • February 2019
        • March 2019
        • April 2019
        • May 2019
        • June 2019
        • July 2019
        • August 2019
        • September 2019
        • October 2019
        • November 2019
        • December 2019
    • 2020 to 2025
      • 2020
        • January 2020
        • February 2020
        • March 2020
        • April 2020
        • May 2020
        • June 2020
        • July 2020
        • August 2020
        • September 2020
        • October 2020
        • November 2020
        • December 2020
      • 2021
        • September 2021
        • October 2021
      • 2022
        • January 2022
        • February 2022
        • March 2022
        • April 2022
        • May 2022
        • June 2022
        • July 2022
        • August 2022
        • September 2022
        • October 2022
        • December 2022
      • 2023
        • January 2023
        • February 2023
        • March 2023
        • April 2023
        • May 2023
        • June 2023
        • July 2023
        • August 2023
        • September 2023
        • October 2023
        • November 2023
        • December 2023
      • 2024
        • January 2024
        • February 2024
        • March 2024
        • April 2024
        • May 2024
        • June 2024
        • July 2024
        • August 2024
        • September 2024
        • October 2024
        • November 2024
        • December 2024
      • 2025
        • January 2025
        • February 2025
        • March 2025
        • April 2025
        • May 2025
  • About Us
  • BT Awards
    • BT Top 40
      • Business Today Top 40 2021 – 2022
    • BT Top 30
      • Business Today Top 30 2015 – 2016
      • Business Today Top 30 2016 – 2017
      • Business Today Top 30 2017 – 2018
      • Business Today Top 30 2018 – 2019
    • BT Top 25
      • Business Today Top 25 2011 – 2012
      • Business Today Top 25 2012 – 2013
      • Business Today Top 25 2013 – 2014
      • Business Today Top 25 2014 – 2015
    • BT Top 20
      • Business Today Top 20 2009 – 2010
      • Business Today Top 20 2010 – 2011
    • BT Top 10
      • Business Today Top 10 2008 – 2009
      • Business Today Top 10 2007 – 2008
      • Business Today Top 10 2006 – 2007
      • Business Today Top 10 2005 – 2006
      • Business Today Top 10 2003 – 2004
      • Business Today Top 10 2000 – 2001
      • Business Today Top 10 1999 – 2000
      • Business Today Top 10 1997 – 1998
      • Business Today Top 10 1996 – 1997
      • Business Today Top 10 1995 – 1996
  • For Digital Subscription

Big Tech’s Staggering Power Consumption: Calculating the Massive Electricity Bills Companies Pay off with Ease

by
Reading Time: 8 mins read
0
Share on Twitter
image_pdfDownload as PDF


September 25, 2024. Paul Hoffman.

High voltage transmission towers with red glowing wires against blue sky – Energy concept

In today’s digital world, tech giants such as Apple, Google, Microsoft, and Nvidia power nearly every aspect of our lives. However, behind the digital services and devices we use daily, these tech companies are running sprawling data centres, global offices, and production facilities that consume staggering amounts of energy. In fact, their power consumption is so massive that it often rivals the annual electricity usage of entire countries, raising serious concerns about the environmental impact and the long-term sustainability of their operations.

To illustrate the scale of this energy consumption, the team at BestBrokers analysed the annual electricity usage of the ten largest tech firms by market capitalisation that publicly disclose their power consumption figures. Amazon, Tesla, and Oracle were excluded from our rankings, as they haven’t provided such data in their most recent sustainability reports. We also calculated how much these companies spend on electricity each year and how quickly they could cover that bill using a single day’s worth of revenue.

Our findings reveal that three of the tech companies we looked at could cover their entire annual electricity costs with less than a single day’s revenue. Leading the pack is Apple, which consumed 3,487 gigawatt-hours of electricity during its 2023 fiscal year. Based on the U.S. business electricity rate of USD 0.131 per kilowatt-hour as of June 2024 (data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration), this amounts to a hefty electricity bill of USD 456.8 million. However, Apple’s massive revenue of USD 1.1 billion per day on average allows it to cover these costs in just ten hours and 26 minutes of operation. This makes Apple’s electricity expenses look like pocket change for a company of its size.

How Fast Tech Giants Can Pay Off Their Annual Power Bills

Besides Apple, Nvidia and Broadcom are also among the fastest tech companies to pay off their power expenses. Nvidia’s electricity consumption surged to 613 gigawatthours in fiscal year 2024, up from the 497 gigawatt-hours the year before. This jump, largely driven by the company’s AI work, pushed its electricity bill to USD 80.3 million. However, with its average revenue of USD 166.9 million per day, Nvidia can settle its annual energy costs in just half a day of operation. Similarly, Broadcom consumed 417 gigawatt-hours of electricity in 2023, which translates to USD 54.6 million in electricity expenses. But with an average daily income of USD 98.1 million, Broadcom can settle its electricity bill in roughly 13 hours.

Google, on the other hand, faces the largest electricity bill among the tech giants we looked at. In 2023, the company used a staggering 25,307 gigawatt-hours of electricity, an increase from the 21,776 gigawatt-hours recorded back in 2022, probably due to the company’s heavy investment in artificial Intelligence. This pushed Google’s electricity costs to a hefty USD 3.3 billion. Yet, even with such a large bill, Google’s average daily revenue of USD 842.2 million means it can cover its power expenses in just under four days. Most of Google’s electricity usage in its last fiscal year was consumed by its vast data centres.

Interestingly, keeping these centres cool required a staggering 6.1 billion litres of water, which, according to the company, is enough to irrigate 41 golf courses for an entire year.

Samsung tops the list in terms of electricity consumption, using nearly 30,000 gigawatt-hours across its global operations in 2023. This massive energy use resulted in an electricity bill of approximately USD three billion, calculated based on South Korea’s 2023 business rate of 130.76 South Korean won per kilowatt-hour (data from Korea Electric Power Corporation), or around USD 0.099 per kWh in U.S. dollars. Despite the steep cost, Samsung’s daily profits of USD 535.7 million on average allow the company to cover its annual power expenses in just over five days and twelve hours.

On the other end of the spectrum, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, the world’s largest chipmaker, faces the longest payback period when it comes to covering its energy costs. Earlier in 2024, Taiwan’s government raised electricity prices, with industrial users seeing an average increase of 13.5 percent. As a “super-large” consumer using over 15 billion kWh annually, TSMC experienced an even steeper rate hike of 25 percent. This meant its cost per kilowatt-hour jumped from NTD 3.38 to NTD 4.23, which is approximately USD 0.132 in U.S. dollars.

In its most recent fiscal year, TSMC consumed a whopping 24,775 gigawatt- hours of energy, bringing its total bill to USD 3.2 billion. With an income of USD 185.1 million per day on average, TSMC would need over 17 days to pay for its power expenses. According to our calculations, these energy costs accounted for about 4.84 percent of TSMC’s total revenue for the year, with the company using 366,751 kilowatt- hours of electricity for every USD 1 million in revenue.

To manage the environmental impact and the massive costs that come with their growing electricity consumption, many tech companies are turning to renewable energy and Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs). These long-term contracts allow tech giants to purchase renewable energy directly from producers, securing a steady supply of green power, often at lower rates. Through PPAs, companies can offset their rising energy demands with clean power from sources like wind, solar, and hydropower.

In addition to investing in renewable energy, large tech companies often benefit from preferential electricity rates. Unlike smaller businesses, tech giants can negotiate special pricing because of the jobs they create and the economic boost they provide to the regions where they operate. As a result, their actual energy costs are often far lower than standard business rates.

Tech Companies Use More Electricity Than Entire Nations

To better illustrate the staggering energy demands of some of the world’s largest tech firms, we compared their annual electricity consumption to that of entire nations. In many cases, these power-hungry companies consume as much, if not more, electricity in a single year than countries with populations in the millions. For instance, Samsung’s electricity consumption of 29,956 gigawatt-hours in its last fiscal year is nearly on par with the annual energy use of entire nations like Ireland and Serbia, each consuming around 31,000 gigawatt-hours, according to the latest U.S. Energy Information Administration data. Remarkably, we found 131 countries and territories, including Ecuador (28,000 GWh) and Slovakia (26,000 GWh), which separately consume less power per year than Samsung.

Even in energy-intensive countries like the United States, which consumes 4,128,000 gigawatt-hours of electricity annually, Samsung’s energy usage in 2023 could power the entire nation for more than two days and a half. In Germany, where annual electricity consumption is around 507,000 gigawatt-hours, the same amount of energy would last for more than three weeks. Similarly, Google’s electricity consumption of 25,307 gigawatt-hours in 2023 outpaced Libya’s entire annual total of 25,000 gigawatt-hours, a country home to over seven million people. The amount of power TSMC used in its most recent fiscal year, on the other hand, surpassed Azerbaijan’s yearly electricity consumption of 24,000 gigawatt-hours. Microsoft, with 23,568 gigawatt-hours in annual electricity use, consumed more energy than countries like Jordan (20,000 GWh), Iceland (19,000 GWh), Puerto Rico (18,000 GWh), and Croatia (17,000 GWh).

Meta (formerly Facebook) closely followed with an annual consumption of 15,325 gigawatt-hours, surpassing the electricity usage of countries like Angola, Cuba, Sudan, and Zambia, each consuming around 15,000 gigawatthours.

Meanwhile, Tencent used 5,115 gigawatt-hours in its last fiscal year, nearly matching the total electricity demand of Brunei (5,200 GWh) and Cyprus (5,000 GWh). Apple required more electricity than countries like Jamaica and Namibia, while Nvidia consumed 613 gigawatt-hours, an amount roughly equivalent to the annual electricity needs of Bermuda, Greenland, or the Seychelles, each of which uses about 600 gigawatt-hours per year.

Meanwhile, ASML and Broadcom reported electricity usage of 480 gigawatt-hours and 417 gigawatthours, respectively. These figures exceed the total energy consumption of small island nations such as Haiti and Saint Lucia, both of which use approximately 400 gigawatt-hours annually.

What Else Could That Power Do?

To put the staggering electricity consumption of these tech giants into perspective, let’s see what else could be powered with the energy they use in a single year. According to the EV Database, the average electric car consumes about 0.191 kilowatt-hours per kilometre and can travel approximately 379 kilometres on a full charge. This means that the average EV battery holds around 72.4 kilowatt hours of energy. If we take Samsung’s electricity consumption of 30 terawatt-hours from last year and divide it by the capacity of an average EV battery, that’s enough energy to fully charge a whopping 413.8 million electric vehicles. In fact, this amount of energy could also charge every EV in the U.S.

125 times. As of the end of 2023, there were about 3.3 million electric cars on American roads. Therefore, charging all these vehicles once would require approximately 238.8 million kilowatt hours of electricity.

When we look at this from a household perspective, Samsung’s 30 terawatt- hours of electricity usage in 2023 could power 2.8 million U.S. homes for an entire year. This estimate is based on the average American household’s energy consumption of around 29 kWh per day, or about 10,585 kWh annually, according to the Energy Information Administration.

While 2.8 million homes are only 2.15 percent of the 131 million households in the United States, it’s still an impressive amount of energy, especially when you consider that the country ranks third globally in terms of the number of households. Google, by comparison, could power 2.4 million U.S. households for a year with its annual electricity consumption of 25 terawatt-hours.

For Bitcoin enthusiasts, there’s a striking comparison as well. The University of Cambridge’s Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index shows that global Bitcoin mining consumes about 39.89 terawatt-hours annually, which works out to 383.3 million kilowatt-hours each day. Following the 2024 Bitcoin halving, miners now earn 3.125 Bitcoins for each block they mine. With 144 blocks mined daily (one every 10 minutes), that totals around 450 Bitcoins per day. When we divide the daily electricity consumption for Bitcoin mining by the number of Bitcoins mined each day, we find that it takes about 851,689 kilowatt-hours to mine a single Bitcoin. Based on this calculation, if Samsung devoted its entire annual electricity consumption to mining, it could produce roughly 35,172 Bitcoins in one year. In comparison, Google could mine 29,700 Bitcoins, while TSMC’s annual power usage could yield around 29,100 Bitcoins.

In the world of artificial intelligence, the possibilities are just as impressive. Each query to ChatGPT uses about 2.9 watt-hours of electricity, according to the Electric Power Research Institute. So, Samsung’s electricity consumption of 30 terawatt-hours could power a mind- blowing 10 trillion ChatGPT prompts. Google’s annual energy usage could generate 8.7 trillion responses, while TSMC could power around 8.5 trillion queries.

Methodology

The team at BestBrokers analysed the electricity consumption of the ten largest tech companies by market capitalisation for their most recent fiscal year. Only firms that publicly disclose their energy usage figures were included in this study, which is why Amazon, Tesla, and Oracle were left out. To estimate the costs of each company’s electricity consumption, we used the average electricity rates for 2023-2024 in the countries where they are headquartered. These rates were sourced from or calculated using data provided by national agencies, including the U.S. Energy Information Administration, Korea Electric Power Corporation and Statistics Netherlands. We then converted local electricity rates into U.S. dollars using exchange rates

from the XE Currency Converter as of September 18, 2024. Each company’s daily revenue was calculated by dividing its 2023 annual revenue by 365 days. This allowed us to determine how quickly each company could cover its entire electricity bill using just one day’s worth of revenue. To put these figures into perspective, we compared the companies’ annual energy consumption to that of entire nations based on the latest data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration. We also used various sources to draw equivalencies in terms of electric vehicles, households, Bitcoin mining, and AI operations.

Tags: big techelectricitypower consumption

Related Posts

Together, Let’s Build Our Nation 
October 2024

Together, Let’s Build Our Nation 

The new Prime Minister and Cabinet sworn in 
October 2024

The new Prime Minister and Cabinet sworn in 

President Anura Kumara Dissanayake’s Inaugural Address to the Nation 
October 2024

President Anura Kumara Dissanayake’s Inaugural Address to the Nation 

business-today-logo

Location

20-2/1 Lauries Place Facing R A de Mel Mawatha Colombo 04.

Contact

+94 715 134 134

Email

info@btoptions.com

© 2023 BT Options. All Rights Reserved.