Retail
Subscription
to Advertise
  • ISSUES
    • 1996 to 1999
      • 1996
        • May 1996
        • June 1996
        • July 1996
        • August 1996
        • September 1996
        • October 1996
        • November 1996
        • December 1996
      • 1997
    • 2000 to 2009
      • 2006
        • January 2006
        • February 2006
        • March 2006
        • April 2006
        • May 2006
        • June 2006
        • July 2006
        • August 2006
        • September 2006
        • October 2006
        • November 2006
        • December 2006
      • 2007
        • March 2007
        • April 2007
        • May 2007
        • July 2007
        • August 2007
        • September 2007
        • November 2007
        • December 2007
      • 2008
        • January 2008
        • February 2008
        • March 2008
        • April 2008
        • May 2008
        • June 2008
        • July 2008
        • August 2008
        • September 2008
        • October 2008
        • November 2008
        • December 2008
      • 2009
        • January 2009
        • February 2009
        • March 2009
        • April 2009
        • May 2009
        • June 2009
        • June 2009
        • July 2009
        • August 2009
        • September 2009
        • October 2009
        • November 2009
        • December 2009
    • 2010 to 2019
      • 2010
        • January 2010
        • February 2010
        • March 2010
        • April 2010
        • May 2010
        • June 2010
        • July 2010
        • August 2010
        • December 2010
      • 2011
        • January 2011
        • February 2011
        • March 2011
        • April 2011
        • May 2011
        • June 2011
        • July 2011
        • August 2011
        • September 2011
        • October 2011
        • November 2011
        • December 2011
      • 2012
        • January 2012
        • February 2012
        • March 2012
        • April 2012
        • May 2012
        • June 2012
        • July 2012
        • August 2012
        • September 2012
        • October 2012
        • November 2012
        • December 2012
      • 2013
        • January 2013
        • February 2013
        • March 2013
        • April 2013
        • May 2013
        • June 2013
        • July 2013
        • August 2013
        • September 2013
        • November 2013
        • December 2013
      • 2014
        • January 2014
        • February 2014
        • March 2014
        • April 2014
        • May 2014
        • June 2014
        • July 2014
        • August 2014
        • September 2014
        • October 2014
        • November 2014
        • December 2014
      • 2015
        • January 2015
        • February 2015
        • March 2015
        • April 2015
        • May 2015
        • June 2015
        • July 2015
        • August 2015
        • September 2015
        • October 2015
        • November 2015
        • December 2015
      • 2016
        • January 2016
        • February 2016
        • March 2016
        • April 2016
        • May 2016
        • June 2016
        • July 2016
        • August 2016
        • October 2016
        • November 2016
        • December 2016
      • 2017
        • January 2017
        • February 2017
        • March 2017
        • April 2017
        • May 2017
        • June 2017
        • July 2017
        • August 2017
        • September 2017
        • October 2017
        • November 2017
        • December 2017
      • 2018
        • January 2018
        • February 2018
        • March 2018
        • April 2018
        • May 2018
        • June 2018
        • July 2018
        • August 2018
        • September 2018
        • October 2018
        • November 2018
        • December 2018
      • 2019
        • January 2019
        • February 2019
        • March 2019
        • April 2019
        • May 2019
        • June 2019
        • July 2019
        • August 2019
        • September 2019
        • October 2019
        • November 2019
        • December 2019
    • 2020 to 2023
      • 2020
        • January 2020
        • February 2020
        • March 2020
        • April 2020
        • May 2020
        • June 2020
        • July 2020
        • August 2020
        • September 2020
        • October 2020
        • November 2020
        • December 2020
      • 2021
        • January 2021
        • February 2021
        • March 2021
        • April 2021
        • May 2021
        • June 2021
        • July 2021
        • August 2021
        • September 2021
        • October 2021
        • November 2021
        • December 2021
      • 2022
        • January 2022
        • June 2022
        • February 2022
        • July 2022
        • March 2022
        • April 2022
        • August 2022
        • May 2022
        • December 2022
      • 2023
        • January 2023
        • February 2023
        • March 2023
        • July 2023
        • April 2023
        • May 2023
        • June 2023
  • FOR DIGITAL SUBSCRIPTION
  • BT AWARDS
    • BT Top 40
      • BT Top 40 2021 – 2022
    • BT Top 30
      • BT Top 30 2018 – 2019
    • BT Top 25
      • BT Top 25 2011 – 2012
      • BT Top 25 2012 – 2013
      • BT Top 25 2013 – 2014
    • BT Top 20
      • BT Top 20 2009 – 2010
      • BT Top 20 2010 – 2011
    • BT Top 10
      • BT Top 10 2008 – 2009
      • BT Top 10 2007 – 2008
      • BT Top 10 2006 – 2007
      • BT Top 10 2005 – 2006
      • BT Top 10 2003 – 2004
      • BT Top 10 2000 – 2001
      • BT Top 10 1999 – 2000
      • BT Top 10 1998 – 1999
      • BT Top 10 1997 – 1998
      • BT Top 10 1996 – 1997
      • BT Top 10 1995 – 1996
  • ABOUT US
No Result
View All Result
Business Today
No Result
View All Result

Recovery of Costs Through User-Pay is Better Rather than Making Exporters and Private Sector Employees Pay Higher Taxes

in November 2022, Uncategorized
0
Damien Fernando

The highest rate for employee income is now increased from 18% to 36%. The revenue planners of this country do not like to learn from developed countries how to recover the cost of government services to the people. They would instead stick to the traditional methods of taxing income earners. There are other ways of recovering the costs of the government and services. The only success story here in Sri Lanka is the passport office. For example, whereas people had to wait for several weeks to obtain a passport for a small fee, they successfully introduced a one-day service for payment of a higher fee. If I am not mistaken, this system recovers the cost of the passport operation and possibly makes a surplus for the department. Apart from this, the treasury or the revenue planners need to be more capable of thinking outside the box, increasing the taxes on private sector employees and exporters.

Most governments have three ways of recovering the expenditure. One is direct taxes such as VAT and income taxes. The second is indirect taxes, such as taxes on food and other imported items. The third, user–pay, is rarely used in Sri Lanka except for passports and motorway use. Unlike other taxes, the payers do not hate user-pay fees and taxes as they get a direct benefit for what they pay.

Also, the user-pay method is a fair system of recovery of costs, unlike making a few people subsidize the services mainly provided to others.

Many government services are now provided free of charge or for a small fee. In any society, subsidizing low-income families is always justified. However, providing free or subsidized services to those who can afford to pay and making private-sector employees pay higher taxes on their income is grossly unfair.

The following are a few examples where the system can be changed to shift to a user-pay method and reduce dependency on the higher income tax from the exporters and the private sector employees.

  1. One of the most significant expenditures of the government is education and higher education. There are approximately 4.2 million schoolchildren between grades 1–12. It is fair to assume that at least 15% of these students come from families with a monthly income of over Rs. 100,000 or with assets of over Rs. 25 million. If such children were made to pay Rs. 5,000 a month for education, the total annual revenue of the education department would be Rs. 37.8 billion. In parallel, the government could also impose a fee of Rs. 5,000 a seat in every private school.
  2. Except for a few highways, all other roads do not charge users for their use. With a per kilometer fee (say 1/3 of the per/km fee for motorways) for the other major roads, the government could at least recover a part of the cost of maintenance and renovation of roads. Rather than having staffed booths like on our highways, there are electronic user fee-collecting systems. An exemption could be given to passenger buses, motorcycles, three-wheelers, and lorries.
  3. The government also spends a considerable amount of money on the work done by the local government institutions. However, the rates charged by the local government institutions are negligible compared to the costs—an apartment or a house worth Rs. 50 million has to pay only Rs. 2,500 a year as a rate. The government could easily charge 0.5% of the property’s value, which would be Rs. 250,000/= a year or around Rs. 20,000/= a month. That is 100 times the current rate. The government could allow the local bodies to retain 30% of the amount they collect as rates and take the balance to cover the infrastructure costs theymust maintain. Also, this will eliminate the costs the central government is paying to local governments. With the government’s infrastructure costs, the property value goes up substantially. Hence, it is fair to recover 0.5% a year on the property value as the owners could enjoy 99.5% of the gain. The current license fee for motor vehicles is also way too small. For example, a Rs. 30 million worth of Land Cruiser Prado has to pay a license fee of Rs. 4,000/=. This is compared to the famous SRI tax introduced by Dr. N.M. Perera in the ’70s, where a car with a registration number starting with 6 SRI had to pay Rs. 600/= a year. While the owner of a Prado would pay only Rs. 4,000/= for the revenue license, he would pay Rs. 600,000/= to insure the same car for one year. The RMV should charge at least 0.2% for the revenue license, which will be Rs. 40,000/-a year. The licensing fees for motorcycles below 300 CC and three-wheelers should remain as it is. The Automobile Association could easily provide the average valuation for each YOM and model of a vehicle to the RMV. Such a fee will increase the revenue of RMV by ten times.

5. The government can implement a student loan scheme for higher education by the government universities. The loan is to be paid monthly for ten years after completing the degree without interest. This will recover a substantial portion of the government’s costs on universities. Subsequently, the student loan scheme could be extended to includeprivate universities. To estimate the recovery, if one assumes 50,000 students enter state universities a year, and the fee for higher education degree is Rs. 10,000/-a month, then the income for a year will be in the range of Rs. 24 billion. There are several advantages to this method. One is that the students will attempt to complete their degree on time rather than staying in university without completing the degree. This is due to his monthly cost increasing by Rs. 10,000/=.The other is that as the university gets paid Rs. 10,000/= a month for every student, they admit they will try to increase the capacity and the intake to increase their revenue.

6. Even for healthcare, a fee of Rs. 100/= for a consultation and, say, Rs. 500/-a day for hospitalization and Rs. 5,000/= for surgery is not unfair for members of a family that has an income of over Rs. 100,000/= a month or Rs. 25 million in assets.

7. Although not an example of a possible user-pay service, the cost of a poverty alleviation scheme (samurdhi) could also be modified to be less costly to the government and more effective for recipients. The poverty alleviation systems have failed to pull a significant portion of the poor out of their situation. If the government coordinates a scheme in which people and companies volunteer to look after a needy family by providing Rs. 10,000 a month, it will be way better than Rs. 3,000 or so the samurdhi pay. The most significant advantage is that the sponsor could provide children with used or new clothes, books, and education and career guidance. Some would help their recipient families with assistance for home renovations, household goods, and food. While many well-to-do individuals and families will volunteer to sponsor another (poor family, large state-sector and private-sector banks and other organizations will volunteer to support hundreds of families. The most crucial part of such a scheme is the guidance and further help the low-income families would get, so many families would come out of poverty after a few years.

The unfair part of this is that private sector employees are made to subsidize the services the government provides for everyone. The private sector employees not only pay for the salaries of the government sector employees but also have to fund their pensions.

The government should introduce a free services card for families with an income of less than Rs. 100,000 a month or Rs. 25 million in assets so they can be provided with free education and healthcare. This should be done based on an affidavit signed by the head of the household. If an applicant gives a false affidavit on their income and assets, they could be prosecuted, and a fine of several times the cost of free services provided could be recovered. Similar systems are implemented in developed countries with reasonable success.

Include high-salaried state employees for income tax While none of the government sector employees pay any tax on their employment income, private sector employees (who do not qualify for any pension on retirement) have to pay exorbitant taxes on their employment income from October 2022. The unfair part of this is that private sector employees are made to subsidize the services the government provides for everyone. The private sector employees not only pay for the salaries of the government sector employees but also have to fund their pensions.

As the current tax-free threshold is Rs. 100,000/= a month, why cannot the income taxes also apply to government sector employees? A salary of Rs. 100,000/= is way more than an average government sector employee gets. There would not be resistance from anyone as only the people with higher incomes get taxed like their counterparts in the private sector. A private sector employee making over Rs. 100,000/-a month must pay the same prices for goods and services as a government sector employee.

The writer is a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Management Accountants of the United Kingdom and has been awarded an MBA from the University of Sri Jayewardenepura. He has held the positions of executive director and non-executive director in several companies in manufacturing, banking, insurance, healthcare, telecommunication, and several other industries. He is currently a director of Melstacorp.

Business Today August 2023

Business Today September 2023

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

© 2023 BT Options. All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • ISSUES
    • 1996 to 1999
      • 1996
      • 1997
    • 2000 to 2009
      • 2006
      • 2007
      • 2008
      • 2009
    • 2010 to 2019
      • 2010
      • 2011
      • 2012
      • 2013
      • 2014
      • 2015
      • 2016
      • 2017
      • 2018
      • 2019
    • 2020 to 2023
      • 2020
      • 2021
      • 2022
      • 2023
  • FOR DIGITAL SUBSCRIPTION
  • BT AWARDS
    • BT Top 40
      • BT Top 40 2021 – 2022
    • BT Top 30
      • BT Top 30 2018 – 2019
    • BT Top 25
      • BT Top 25 2011 – 2012
      • BT Top 25 2012 – 2013
      • BT Top 25 2013 – 2014
    • BT Top 20
      • BT Top 20 2009 – 2010
      • BT Top 20 2010 – 2011
    • BT Top 10
      • BT Top 10 2008 – 2009
      • BT Top 10 2007 – 2008
      • BT Top 10 2006 – 2007
      • BT Top 10 2005 – 2006
      • BT Top 10 2003 – 2004
      • BT Top 10 2000 – 2001
      • BT Top 10 1999 – 2000
      • BT Top 10 1998 – 1999
      • BT Top 10 1997 – 1998
      • BT Top 10 1996 – 1997
      • BT Top 10 1995 – 1996
  • ABOUT US

© 2023 BT Options. All Rights Reserved