Business Today

business-today-logo
SUBSCRIPTION
ADVERTISE
Menu
  • Home
  • Issues
    • 1996 to 1999
      • 1996
        • May 1996
        • June 1996
        • July 1996
        • August 1996
        • September 1996
        • October 1996
        • November 1996
        • December 1996
      • 1997
        • January 1997
        • FEBRUARY 1997
        • March 1997
        • April 1997
        • May 1997
        • June 1997
        • July 1997
        • August 1997
        • September 1997
        • October 1997
        • November 1997
        • December 1997
    • 2000 to 2009
      • 2006
        • January 2006
        • February 2006
        • March 2006
        • April 2006
        • May 2006
        • June 2006
        • July 2006
        • August 2006
        • September 2006
        • October 2006
        • November 2006
        • December 2006
      • 2007
        • January 2007
        • February 2007
        • March 2007
        • April 2007
        • May 2007
        • July 2007
        • June 2007
        • August 2007
        • September 2007
        • October 2007
        • November 2007
        • December 2007
      • 2008
        • January 2008
        • February 2008
        • March 2008
        • May 2008
        • April 2008
        • June 2008
        • July 2008
        • August 2008
        • September 2008
        • November 2008
        • October 2008
        • December 2008
      • 2009
        • January 2009
        • February 2009
        • March 2009
        • April 2009
        • May 2009
        • June 2009
        • July 2009
        • August 2009
        • September 2009
        • October 2009
        • November 2009
        • December 2009
    • 2010 to 2019
      • 2010
        • January 2010
        • February 2010
        • March 2010
        • April 2010
        • May 2010
        • June 2010
        • July 2010
        • August 2010
        • September 2010
        • October 2010
        • November 2010
        • December 2010
      • 2011
        • January 2011
        • February 2011
        • March 2011
        • April 2011
        • May 2011
        • June 2011
        • July 2011
        • August 2011
        • September 2011
        • October 2011
        • November 2011
        • December 2011
      • 2012
        • January 2012
        • February 2012
        • March 2012
        • April 2012
        • May 2012
        • June 2012
        • July 2012
        • August 2012
        • September 2012
        • October 2012
        • November 2012
        • December 2012
      • 2013
        • January 2013
        • February 2013
        • March 2013
        • April 2013
        • May 2013
        • June 2013
        • July 2013
        • August 2013
        • September 2013
        • October 2013
        • November 2013
        • December 2013
      • 2014
        • January 2014
        • February 2014
        • March 2014
        • April 2014
        • May 2014
        • June 2014
        • July 2014
        • August 2014
        • September 2014
        • October 2014
        • November 2014
        • December 2014
      • 2015
        • January 2015
        • February 2015
        • March 2015
        • April 2015
        • May 2015
        • June 2015
        • July 2015
        • August 2015
        • September 2015
        • October 2015
        • November 2015
        • December 2015
      • 2016
        • January 2016
        • February 2016
        • March 2016
        • April 2016
        • May 2016
        • June 2016
        • July 2016
        • August 2016
        • September 2016
        • October 2016
        • November 2016
        • December 2016
      • 2017
        • January 2017
        • February 2017
        • March 2017
        • April 2017
        • May 2017
        • June 2017
        • July 2017
        • August 2017
        • September 2017
        • October 2017
        • November 2017
        • December 2017
      • 2018
        • January 2018
        • February 2018
        • March 2018
        • April 2018
        • May 2018
        • August 2018
        • June 2018
        • July 2018
        • September 2018
        • October 2018
        • November 2018
        • December 2018
      • 2019
        • January 2019
        • February 2019
        • March 2019
        • April 2019
        • May 2019
        • June 2019
        • July 2019
        • August 2019
        • September 2019
        • October 2019
        • November 2019
        • December 2019
    • 2020 to 2025
      • 2020
        • January 2020
        • February 2020
        • March 2020
        • April 2020
        • May 2020
        • June 2020
        • July 2020
        • August 2020
        • September 2020
        • October 2020
        • November 2020
        • December 2020
      • 2021
        • September 2021
        • October 2021
      • 2022
        • January 2022
        • February 2022
        • March 2022
        • April 2022
        • May 2022
        • June 2022
        • July 2022
        • August 2022
        • September 2022
        • October 2022
        • December 2022
      • 2023
        • January 2023
        • February 2023
        • March 2023
        • April 2023
        • May 2023
        • June 2023
        • July 2023
        • August 2023
        • September 2023
        • October 2023
        • November 2023
        • December 2023
      • 2024
        • January 2024
        • February 2024
        • March 2024
        • April 2024
        • May 2024
        • June 2024
        • July 2024
        • August 2024
        • September 2024
        • October 2024
        • November 2024
        • December 2024
      • 2025
        • January 2025
        • February 2025
        • March 2025
        • April 2025
        • May 2025
        • June 2025
  • About Us
  • BT Awards
    • BT Top 40
      • Business Today Top 40 2021 – 2022
    • BT Top 30
      • Business Today Top 30 2015 – 2016
      • Business Today Top 30 2016 – 2017
      • Business Today Top 30 2017 – 2018
      • Business Today Top 30 2018 – 2019
    • BT Top 25
      • Business Today Top 25 2011 – 2012
      • Business Today Top 25 2012 – 2013
      • Business Today Top 25 2013 – 2014
      • Business Today Top 25 2014 – 2015
    • BT Top 20
      • Business Today Top 20 2009 – 2010
      • Business Today Top 20 2010 – 2011
    • BT Top 10
      • Business Today Top 10 2008 – 2009
      • Business Today Top 10 2007 – 2008
      • Business Today Top 10 2006 – 2007
      • Business Today Top 10 2005 – 2006
      • Business Today Top 10 2003 – 2004
      • Business Today Top 10 2000 – 2001
      • Business Today Top 10 1999 – 2000
      • Business Today Top 10 1997 – 1998
      • Business Today Top 10 1996 – 1997
      • Business Today Top 10 1995 – 1996
  • For Digital Subscription
Facebook Instagram
business-today-logo
Menu
  • Home
  • Issues
    • 1996 to 1999
      • 1996
        • May 1996
        • June 1996
        • July 1996
        • August 1996
        • September 1996
        • October 1996
        • November 1996
        • December 1996
      • 1997
        • January 1997
        • FEBRUARY 1997
        • March 1997
        • April 1997
        • May 1997
        • June 1997
        • July 1997
        • August 1997
        • September 1997
        • October 1997
        • November 1997
        • December 1997
    • 2000 to 2009
      • 2006
        • January 2006
        • February 2006
        • March 2006
        • April 2006
        • May 2006
        • June 2006
        • July 2006
        • August 2006
        • September 2006
        • October 2006
        • November 2006
        • December 2006
      • 2007
        • January 2007
        • February 2007
        • March 2007
        • April 2007
        • May 2007
        • July 2007
        • June 2007
        • August 2007
        • September 2007
        • October 2007
        • November 2007
        • December 2007
      • 2008
        • January 2008
        • February 2008
        • March 2008
        • May 2008
        • April 2008
        • June 2008
        • July 2008
        • August 2008
        • September 2008
        • November 2008
        • October 2008
        • December 2008
      • 2009
        • January 2009
        • February 2009
        • March 2009
        • April 2009
        • May 2009
        • June 2009
        • July 2009
        • August 2009
        • September 2009
        • October 2009
        • November 2009
        • December 2009
    • 2010 to 2019
      • 2010
        • January 2010
        • February 2010
        • March 2010
        • April 2010
        • May 2010
        • June 2010
        • July 2010
        • August 2010
        • September 2010
        • October 2010
        • November 2010
        • December 2010
      • 2011
        • January 2011
        • February 2011
        • March 2011
        • April 2011
        • May 2011
        • June 2011
        • July 2011
        • August 2011
        • September 2011
        • October 2011
        • November 2011
        • December 2011
      • 2012
        • January 2012
        • February 2012
        • March 2012
        • April 2012
        • May 2012
        • June 2012
        • July 2012
        • August 2012
        • September 2012
        • October 2012
        • November 2012
        • December 2012
      • 2013
        • January 2013
        • February 2013
        • March 2013
        • April 2013
        • May 2013
        • June 2013
        • July 2013
        • August 2013
        • September 2013
        • October 2013
        • November 2013
        • December 2013
      • 2014
        • January 2014
        • February 2014
        • March 2014
        • April 2014
        • May 2014
        • June 2014
        • July 2014
        • August 2014
        • September 2014
        • October 2014
        • November 2014
        • December 2014
      • 2015
        • January 2015
        • February 2015
        • March 2015
        • April 2015
        • May 2015
        • June 2015
        • July 2015
        • August 2015
        • September 2015
        • October 2015
        • November 2015
        • December 2015
      • 2016
        • January 2016
        • February 2016
        • March 2016
        • April 2016
        • May 2016
        • June 2016
        • July 2016
        • August 2016
        • September 2016
        • October 2016
        • November 2016
        • December 2016
      • 2017
        • January 2017
        • February 2017
        • March 2017
        • April 2017
        • May 2017
        • June 2017
        • July 2017
        • August 2017
        • September 2017
        • October 2017
        • November 2017
        • December 2017
      • 2018
        • January 2018
        • February 2018
        • March 2018
        • April 2018
        • May 2018
        • August 2018
        • June 2018
        • July 2018
        • September 2018
        • October 2018
        • November 2018
        • December 2018
      • 2019
        • January 2019
        • February 2019
        • March 2019
        • April 2019
        • May 2019
        • June 2019
        • July 2019
        • August 2019
        • September 2019
        • October 2019
        • November 2019
        • December 2019
    • 2020 to 2025
      • 2020
        • January 2020
        • February 2020
        • March 2020
        • April 2020
        • May 2020
        • June 2020
        • July 2020
        • August 2020
        • September 2020
        • October 2020
        • November 2020
        • December 2020
      • 2021
        • September 2021
        • October 2021
      • 2022
        • January 2022
        • February 2022
        • March 2022
        • April 2022
        • May 2022
        • June 2022
        • July 2022
        • August 2022
        • September 2022
        • October 2022
        • December 2022
      • 2023
        • January 2023
        • February 2023
        • March 2023
        • April 2023
        • May 2023
        • June 2023
        • July 2023
        • August 2023
        • September 2023
        • October 2023
        • November 2023
        • December 2023
      • 2024
        • January 2024
        • February 2024
        • March 2024
        • April 2024
        • May 2024
        • June 2024
        • July 2024
        • August 2024
        • September 2024
        • October 2024
        • November 2024
        • December 2024
      • 2025
        • January 2025
        • February 2025
        • March 2025
        • April 2025
        • May 2025
        • June 2025
  • About Us
  • BT Awards
    • BT Top 40
      • Business Today Top 40 2021 – 2022
    • BT Top 30
      • Business Today Top 30 2015 – 2016
      • Business Today Top 30 2016 – 2017
      • Business Today Top 30 2017 – 2018
      • Business Today Top 30 2018 – 2019
    • BT Top 25
      • Business Today Top 25 2011 – 2012
      • Business Today Top 25 2012 – 2013
      • Business Today Top 25 2013 – 2014
      • Business Today Top 25 2014 – 2015
    • BT Top 20
      • Business Today Top 20 2009 – 2010
      • Business Today Top 20 2010 – 2011
    • BT Top 10
      • Business Today Top 10 2008 – 2009
      • Business Today Top 10 2007 – 2008
      • Business Today Top 10 2006 – 2007
      • Business Today Top 10 2005 – 2006
      • Business Today Top 10 2003 – 2004
      • Business Today Top 10 2000 – 2001
      • Business Today Top 10 1999 – 2000
      • Business Today Top 10 1997 – 1998
      • Business Today Top 10 1996 – 1997
      • Business Today Top 10 1995 – 1996
  • For Digital Subscription
business-today-logo
Menu
  • Home
  • Issues
    • 1996 to 1999
      • 1996
        • May 1996
        • June 1996
        • July 1996
        • August 1996
        • September 1996
        • October 1996
        • November 1996
        • December 1996
      • 1997
        • January 1997
        • FEBRUARY 1997
        • March 1997
        • April 1997
        • May 1997
        • June 1997
        • July 1997
        • August 1997
        • September 1997
        • October 1997
        • November 1997
        • December 1997
    • 2000 to 2009
      • 2006
        • January 2006
        • February 2006
        • March 2006
        • April 2006
        • May 2006
        • June 2006
        • July 2006
        • August 2006
        • September 2006
        • October 2006
        • November 2006
        • December 2006
      • 2007
        • January 2007
        • February 2007
        • March 2007
        • April 2007
        • May 2007
        • July 2007
        • June 2007
        • August 2007
        • September 2007
        • October 2007
        • November 2007
        • December 2007
      • 2008
        • January 2008
        • February 2008
        • March 2008
        • May 2008
        • April 2008
        • June 2008
        • July 2008
        • August 2008
        • September 2008
        • November 2008
        • October 2008
        • December 2008
      • 2009
        • January 2009
        • February 2009
        • March 2009
        • April 2009
        • May 2009
        • June 2009
        • July 2009
        • August 2009
        • September 2009
        • October 2009
        • November 2009
        • December 2009
    • 2010 to 2019
      • 2010
        • January 2010
        • February 2010
        • March 2010
        • April 2010
        • May 2010
        • June 2010
        • July 2010
        • August 2010
        • September 2010
        • October 2010
        • November 2010
        • December 2010
      • 2011
        • January 2011
        • February 2011
        • March 2011
        • April 2011
        • May 2011
        • June 2011
        • July 2011
        • August 2011
        • September 2011
        • October 2011
        • November 2011
        • December 2011
      • 2012
        • January 2012
        • February 2012
        • March 2012
        • April 2012
        • May 2012
        • June 2012
        • July 2012
        • August 2012
        • September 2012
        • October 2012
        • November 2012
        • December 2012
      • 2013
        • January 2013
        • February 2013
        • March 2013
        • April 2013
        • May 2013
        • June 2013
        • July 2013
        • August 2013
        • September 2013
        • October 2013
        • November 2013
        • December 2013
      • 2014
        • January 2014
        • February 2014
        • March 2014
        • April 2014
        • May 2014
        • June 2014
        • July 2014
        • August 2014
        • September 2014
        • October 2014
        • November 2014
        • December 2014
      • 2015
        • January 2015
        • February 2015
        • March 2015
        • April 2015
        • May 2015
        • June 2015
        • July 2015
        • August 2015
        • September 2015
        • October 2015
        • November 2015
        • December 2015
      • 2016
        • January 2016
        • February 2016
        • March 2016
        • April 2016
        • May 2016
        • June 2016
        • July 2016
        • August 2016
        • September 2016
        • October 2016
        • November 2016
        • December 2016
      • 2017
        • January 2017
        • February 2017
        • March 2017
        • April 2017
        • May 2017
        • June 2017
        • July 2017
        • August 2017
        • September 2017
        • October 2017
        • November 2017
        • December 2017
      • 2018
        • January 2018
        • February 2018
        • March 2018
        • April 2018
        • May 2018
        • August 2018
        • June 2018
        • July 2018
        • September 2018
        • October 2018
        • November 2018
        • December 2018
      • 2019
        • January 2019
        • February 2019
        • March 2019
        • April 2019
        • May 2019
        • June 2019
        • July 2019
        • August 2019
        • September 2019
        • October 2019
        • November 2019
        • December 2019
    • 2020 to 2025
      • 2020
        • January 2020
        • February 2020
        • March 2020
        • April 2020
        • May 2020
        • June 2020
        • July 2020
        • August 2020
        • September 2020
        • October 2020
        • November 2020
        • December 2020
      • 2021
        • September 2021
        • October 2021
      • 2022
        • January 2022
        • February 2022
        • March 2022
        • April 2022
        • May 2022
        • June 2022
        • July 2022
        • August 2022
        • September 2022
        • October 2022
        • December 2022
      • 2023
        • January 2023
        • February 2023
        • March 2023
        • April 2023
        • May 2023
        • June 2023
        • July 2023
        • August 2023
        • September 2023
        • October 2023
        • November 2023
        • December 2023
      • 2024
        • January 2024
        • February 2024
        • March 2024
        • April 2024
        • May 2024
        • June 2024
        • July 2024
        • August 2024
        • September 2024
        • October 2024
        • November 2024
        • December 2024
      • 2025
        • January 2025
        • February 2025
        • March 2025
        • April 2025
        • May 2025
        • June 2025
  • About Us
  • BT Awards
    • BT Top 40
      • Business Today Top 40 2021 – 2022
    • BT Top 30
      • Business Today Top 30 2015 – 2016
      • Business Today Top 30 2016 – 2017
      • Business Today Top 30 2017 – 2018
      • Business Today Top 30 2018 – 2019
    • BT Top 25
      • Business Today Top 25 2011 – 2012
      • Business Today Top 25 2012 – 2013
      • Business Today Top 25 2013 – 2014
      • Business Today Top 25 2014 – 2015
    • BT Top 20
      • Business Today Top 20 2009 – 2010
      • Business Today Top 20 2010 – 2011
    • BT Top 10
      • Business Today Top 10 2008 – 2009
      • Business Today Top 10 2007 – 2008
      • Business Today Top 10 2006 – 2007
      • Business Today Top 10 2005 – 2006
      • Business Today Top 10 2003 – 2004
      • Business Today Top 10 2000 – 2001
      • Business Today Top 10 1999 – 2000
      • Business Today Top 10 1997 – 1998
      • Business Today Top 10 1996 – 1997
      • Business Today Top 10 1995 – 1996
  • For Digital Subscription

How WeWork Failed 

by
Reading Time: 10 mins read
0
Share on Twitter
image_pdfDownload as PDF

Valued at a whopping $47 billion at one point, WeWork, the workplace real estate renter and one-time poster child of the effervescent startup culture is wobbling today. On the cusp of bankruptcy, today analysts are saying the same thing in one chorus. WeWork was one of the most hyped startups in recent years. Looking at the case of WeWork, analysts are wondering whether the startup bubble, the darling of modern-day corporate chivalry and the poster child for entrepreneurial genius, is about to fade into the history of vain startups. 

By Jennifer Paldano Goonewardane. 

WeWork office spaces.

Masayoshi Son, the founder of SoftBank, the majority shareholder of WeWork and one of its prolific backers convinced of its business model and growth potential, was quoted as saying that WeWork would be the “next Alibaba”. Towards that dream, he injected heaps of money into the startup. However, more than a decade after the promising startup made its debut and more t han five years a fter Son’s entry, t he company is yet to find the treasure in the cave despite receiving the “magic words” from investors who believed in its founder and team to make good on their promises.

The Fallacy of the Charismatic Leader

What is with startups and their founders who aid the wave of corporate revolution, new business models, and new thinking with excellent articulation, crowned and celebrated as models of hard work only to be dethroned and relegated to pariahs in the startup culture dustbin? The media elevated Elizabeth Holmes and Sam Bankman-Fried of FTX at their zenith and followed them with the same fervor as they fell from grace. These young innovators were dubbed the next Steve Jobs, the dropouts on their journey to make it big. Significant investors were throwing their weight behind them and elevating their star power. They were CEOs and founders in turtlenecks, attending speaking sessions with politicians in casuals, shorts, t-shirts, and sneakers.

With their fall comes off the facade. A flurry of news follows as prosecutors, investigators, and investors pursue them for justice and their pound of flesh. The magic evaporates. Their reputations descend to that of bullies and abusers who drank and smoked and led a toxic working environment. They become impersonators and charlatans who use other people’s money to live lavishly and pay themselves hefty cheques, feigning charisma, fooling investors, and enrapturing the public into believing in their enterprises. Young graduates listen in awe to their stories of resilience and grandiose plans for the future, hoping to learn a lesson or two from their journey. A better lesson would be to learn from their downfalls and know what not to do to get there.

The rise and fall of WeWork may have garnered less attention than other startups like Theranos and FTX. However, the story resonates well with the general trend in the startup ecosystem of limiting the story to a star individual and over-hyping the product beyond its potential. Part of the problem is often the founders themselves.

The WeWork arrangement suited even the established big corporates looking to set up in a new market, where its readymade office floor with all the facilities helped them set up shop without the hassle of organizing from scratch.

Impressive Rise but Problematic Founder

WeWork had an exciting and straightforward business model. Started in 2010 by Adam Neumann and Miguel McKelvey, the company organized co-working spaces by taking long-term leases of buildings, dividing them into smaller working areas, and subletting them to small businesses, startups and freelancers. As they touted, their product made working spaces affordable to individuals and companies unable to afford large office budgets. They made their unique proposition more appealing by creating sassy spaces that merged efficiency requirements with an ambiance that complimented the youthful and dynamic startup ecosystem with distinctive interiors with a range of facilities that a conventional workspace would afford. Their arrangements were flexible for clients wanting to make changes or expand their working areas to accommodate more people. At its pinnacle, WeWork seemed unstoppable, perched to be the next big startup wonder of the era.

Some significant backers in JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs and even Amazon supported its rise. However, its most prolific investor was the CEO of SoftBank, a vision fund, who, after a brief meeting with Neumann in 2017, had decided to invest $4.4 billion. As reported, at one point, WeWork had 847 locations spread across 123 cities worldwide. The company under Neuman expanded to include more ventures, rebranding itself as The We Company.

Since its meteoric rise from its launch in 2010, including Neumann landing on the Forbes front cover in October 2017 that hyped the new working order he founded, one of the next billion-dollar startups, the company never once turned in a profit despite billions of dollars in value.

The so-called simple business model, in operation, had mixed outcomes. For those who needed more capital to invest in office infrastructure and were unsure of their future direction and hence the size of the workforce and company, the WeWork model suited their circumstances. The WeWork arrangement suited even the established big corporates looking to set up in a new market, where its readymade office floor with all the facilities helped them set up shop without the hassle of organizing from scratch. The straightforward business model had its downsides, as pointed out by multiple analysts. It was a risky model that reacted to market volatility. The company had the power to leverage on full occupancy and increasing rents and not otherwise. In the case of WeWork, because it had rented enormous real estate on long-term leases, it still had to pay for them when occupancy reduced or when the real estate market tanked—sustaining their leased buildings during business downsides led to heavy cash outflows.

People who have followed the story of WeWork are pointing to its façade. First, it called itself a tech company, whereas it only sold office spaces equipped with technology its clients depend on to drive their ventures. Once heralded as the future of office spaces but constantly mired by downsides and strategic blunders, the period under Neumann from 2010 to 2019 was dominated by growth pursuits, an endeavor described as being pursued at all costs. Some attribute the company’s woes, continuing despite the ouster of its co-founder and CEO Neumann in 2019, to its aggressive expansion drive that naturally sent costs rocketing and putting the company in peril. The woes were of its own making. They were blunders as offshoots of their decisions. The company spent extensively creating appealing interiors in their shared workspaces, including giving free beer in some locations.

First IPO Attempt Exposes the Façade

Neumann became the focus in 2019 before his ouster when its first attempt at going public floundered. The first IPO attempt was the initial warning to investors about the actual goings-on in the company. With filings requiring substantial disclosures, they found that WeWork had made lavish projections for the market size of its business model. Naturally, potential investors raised concerns about the company’s path to profitability. Analysts point out that in being a long-term lessee who, as a short-term lessor, depended on revenue from short-term leasing, the company operated on shaky ground. The IPO filings disclosed the company’s losses, such as losing $5000 per new customer. In 2018, the year before its first IPO attempt, WeWork, with a revenue of $1.8 billion, incurred losses of $ 1.9 billion.

Meanwhile, the charismatic Neumann was wooing audiences with his unconventional attire, the barefoot CEO who traipsed the office casually in bare feet in a t-shirt and long hair. Neumann was ambitious and wanted ascendency fast, like most new entrepreneurs. He seemed infallible and invincible at his zenith. But Neumann was allegedly dipping too much into the company’s wallet on private jets and other spending sprees. With filed documents revealing the reality and with concerns raised, SoftBank, the company’s biggest shareholder, was seeking a delay in the IPO. SoftBank had a 31 percent stake in the company. Hence, any drop in value could result in SoftBank losing billions of dollars. By the third quarter of 2019, the value of WeWork had dropped to $5 billion, an 80 percent decline from the initial valuation made by the company. After the failed IPO, SoftBank lost over $10 billion, rescuing the company. As its majority shareholder, SoftBank has taken the beating for the failures of WeWork, with its founder Masayoshi Son at one point backing Neumann and his Eldorado to the hilt but later regretting his poor judgement.

The problem with Neumann was not only his lavish spending on parties, drinking and a jet but also a conflict of interest. Neumann borrowed from WeWork at low-interest rates to buy real estate, which, in turn, he had leased to WeWork. He was also selling his stocks in the company. Neumann also trademarked the name “We” and sold it back to the company, making millions of dollars out of it. He stepped down in the aftermath of the failed IPO and a slew of exposes, but not without walking away with $1.7 billion as the price for his exit.

New CEO Sandeep Mathrani had impressive real estate experience and came on board in early 2020 to turn the company around. But just as he took over, the COVID-19 pandemic engulfed the world and redefined hitherto working arrangements, forcing people to adapt and engage in remote work from their homes. Occupancy at their properties plummeted to 46 percent in 2020. As per their business model, their co-working clients were on short-term lease agreements, which meant that they did not return for renewal with the pandemic extending throughout the year and into 2021, forcing the company to start laying off employees, including letting go of some of its best underperforming properties and assets acquired during Neumann’s time, such as a private jet and selling off the subsidiaries that he had invested in through WeWork.

After the failed IPO, SoftBank lost over $10 billion, rescuing the company. As its majority shareholder, SoftBank has taken the beating for the failures of WeWork, with its founder Masayoshi Son at one point backing Neumann and his Eldorado to the hilt but later regretting his poor judgement.

 

Another IPO Attempt

These measures did help the company reduce costs by 2021. Encouraged by this outcome, the company launched its second bid at going public through a public purpose acquisition company (SPAC) merger. The valuation was $9 billion. Meanwhile, the company was losing money annually, estimated at more than a billion dollars. However, the new management argued that it had shed the encumbrances from Neumann’s conduct and the pandemic. Hence, it needed only 70 percent occupancy to break even on an adjusted EBITDA.

If the pandemic became the biggest challenge to its working model, the post-pandemic requirements became a pitching point for WeWork. COVID-19 re-wrote working arrangements, provided new meaning to working from home and demonstrated how remote working is possible and how companies could keep costs low by providing the infrastructure for employees to work remotely. Hence, the new order of a shortened work week of three days in the office and the rest remotely helped businesses to rent spaces and seats they only needed according to attendance. WeWork was offering the flexible spaces that the new working order demanded, and pundits were suddenly changing their tune to praise the WeWork model as ideal for the post-pandemic working requirements of accommodating small groups.

The SPAC arrangement helped the company raise $1.3 billion in new capital in the third quarter of 2021. The IPO valuation from the once staggering $47 billion had come down to $9 billion. Going public and raising new capital under a more prudent management team allowed WeWork to get back on track, including increasing its occupancy as the threat of the pandemic eased, reaching 73 percent occupancy in the first quarter of 2023, expanding the company’s contribution margin, indicating a reduction in overhead costs, while reducing its selling, general and administrative costs, a combination that helps drive a company towards profitability. In the fourth quarter of 2022, WeWork reported improvements to its contribution margin and general and administrative costs. These are two zones that the company had been fiercely grappling to rein in, with some previous quarters recording general and administrative expenses of over $200 million and negative contribution margins.

Continuing Downhill

However, the turnaround that was taking place at the end of 2022 following fresh capital infusion was not enough to stop the downward spiral, which some analysts point, apart from the external environmental factors concerning property valuations, could also be a result of the company losing its productivity in the process of cost-cutting. According to some reports, Extreme cost-cutting measures that included laying off staff could be impacting its overall performance. Hybrid working arrangements of the pandemic era continue to result in companies cutting costs for physical spaces, thereby impacting office property valuation. Compared to its revenue, the company’s general and administrative costs have remained high. Soaring operating expenses are impacting its revenues. In the first half of 2023, the company had spent $646 million. But the company reported an improvement in net losses at the end of the second quarter in 2023, a drop from $577 million last year to $349 million. At the end of the second quarter of 2023, the company had $205 million in hand.

The company has issued a going concern warning, a term used by companies expressing their doubts about their ability to cover expenses in the next year. A going-concern sign is a concern because it often foretells a company on the cusp of bankruptcy. The company has stated that it has “substantial doubts” about its ability to stay in business. In August, its share value plummeted below one dollar, exposing it to the possibility of being removed from the New York Stock Exchange. However, the company hopes to continue on a new trajectory, stating that amid tenant turnover, it will renegotiate for more favorable leases with landlords, focus on reducing rental costs, increase revenue and raise capital.

Substantial analysis has gone into studying the rise and fall of WeWork. While analysts are trying to point to specifics, a sequence of events and missteps, a lot of sugar coating and focusing on appearances to market its idea, which were, at best, marketing tools, rather than making a solid business case for the company. Analysts have pointed out that if the company thought that taking out Neumann when its initial attempt at going public failed in humiliation was enough, then that could explain the reason for its continuing saga of woes. Potential investors studying the company’s business model found that while the company had been running losses, the business model itself was unfeasible in the long term. Neumann liked pitching his company as a transformational technology company while operating in real estate. The company needed to address its key constituents convincingly. As a business model in a volatile industry, its executives had overlooked economic headwinds and their impacts and failed to account for them.

With the decline of WeWork, analysts are pondering on the problems with the startup ecosystem propelled by the rise of the Silicon Valley bubble that is demonstrating a boom-bust cycle, whether their founders are drowning in their unrealistic ideas, are prone to take too many risks and ill-judged decisions on spending, while also mismanaging and misallocating funds. In the case of WeWork, it was operating in a volatile market, which demanded a reactive and prepared mindset to changes and vigilance to market instabilities. WeWork wants to continue and resurrect itself. Hopefully, unlike Humpty Dumpty, someone will be able to put WeWork back together after the fall.

 

Miguel McKelvey, Co-founder, WeWork. 

Adam Neumann, Co-founder, WeWork.

Tags: featuredgeneral

Related Posts

How Singapore Built its Premium 
September 2023

How Singapore Built its Premium 

The Country Needs an Architecture that is Compatible with Future Climate Changes: President Ranil Wickremesinghe 
September 2023

The Country Needs an Architecture that is Compatible with Future Climate Changes: President Ranil Wickremesinghe 

People’s Leasing Achieves 3.02 Billion Profit After Tax in FY 2022/23 
September 2023

People’s Leasing Achieves 3.02 Billion Profit After Tax in FY 2022/23 

business-today-logo

Location

20-2/1 Lauries Place Facing R A de Mel Mawatha Colombo 04.

Contact

+94 715 134 134

Email

info@btoptions.com

© 2023 BT Options. All Rights Reserved.