Retail
Subscription
to Advertise
  • ISSUES
    • 1996 to 1999
      • 1996
        • May 1996
        • June 1996
        • July 1996
        • August 1996
        • September 1996
        • October 1996
        • November 1996
        • December 1996
      • 1997
    • 2000 to 2009
      • 2006
        • January 2006
        • February 2006
        • March 2006
        • April 2006
        • May 2006
        • June 2006
        • July 2006
        • August 2006
        • September 2006
        • October 2006
        • November 2006
        • December 2006
      • 2007
        • March 2007
        • April 2007
        • May 2007
        • July 2007
        • August 2007
        • September 2007
        • November 2007
        • December 2007
      • 2008
        • January 2008
        • February 2008
        • March 2008
        • April 2008
        • May 2008
        • June 2008
        • July 2008
        • August 2008
        • September 2008
        • October 2008
        • November 2008
        • December 2008
      • 2009
        • January 2009
        • February 2009
        • March 2009
        • April 2009
        • May 2009
        • June 2009
        • June 2009
        • July 2009
        • August 2009
        • September 2009
        • October 2009
        • November 2009
        • December 2009
    • 2010 to 2019
      • 2010
        • January 2010
        • February 2010
        • March 2010
        • April 2010
        • May 2010
        • June 2010
        • July 2010
        • August 2010
        • December 2010
      • 2011
        • January 2011
        • February 2011
        • March 2011
        • April 2011
        • May 2011
        • June 2011
        • July 2011
        • August 2011
        • September 2011
        • October 2011
        • November 2011
        • December 2011
      • 2012
        • January 2012
        • February 2012
        • March 2012
        • April 2012
        • May 2012
        • June 2012
        • July 2012
        • August 2012
        • September 2012
        • October 2012
        • November 2012
        • December 2012
      • 2013
        • January 2013
        • February 2013
        • March 2013
        • April 2013
        • May 2013
        • June 2013
        • July 2013
        • August 2013
        • September 2013
        • November 2013
        • December 2013
      • 2014
        • January 2014
        • February 2014
        • March 2014
        • April 2014
        • May 2014
        • June 2014
        • July 2014
        • August 2014
        • September 2014
        • October 2014
        • November 2014
        • December 2014
      • 2015
        • January 2015
        • February 2015
        • March 2015
        • April 2015
        • May 2015
        • June 2015
        • July 2015
        • August 2015
        • September 2015
        • October 2015
        • November 2015
        • December 2015
      • 2016
        • January 2016
        • February 2016
        • March 2016
        • April 2016
        • May 2016
        • June 2016
        • July 2016
        • August 2016
        • October 2016
        • November 2016
        • December 2016
      • 2017
        • January 2017
        • February 2017
        • March 2017
        • April 2017
        • May 2017
        • June 2017
        • July 2017
        • August 2017
        • September 2017
        • October 2017
        • November 2017
        • December 2017
      • 2018
        • January 2018
        • February 2018
        • March 2018
        • April 2018
        • May 2018
        • June 2018
        • July 2018
        • August 2018
        • September 2018
        • October 2018
        • November 2018
        • December 2018
      • 2019
        • January 2019
        • February 2019
        • March 2019
        • April 2019
        • May 2019
        • June 2019
        • July 2019
        • August 2019
        • September 2019
        • October 2019
        • November 2019
        • December 2019
    • 2020 to 2023
      • 2020
        • January 2020
        • February 2020
        • March 2020
        • April 2020
        • May 2020
        • June 2020
        • July 2020
        • August 2020
        • September 2020
        • October 2020
        • November 2020
        • December 2020
      • 2021
        • January 2021
        • February 2021
        • March 2021
        • April 2021
        • May 2021
        • June 2021
        • July 2021
        • August 2021
        • September 2021
        • October 2021
        • November 2021
        • December 2021
      • 2022
        • January 2022
        • June 2022
        • February 2022
        • July 2022
        • March 2022
        • April 2022
        • August 2022
        • May 2022
        • December 2022
      • 2023
        • January 2023
        • February 2023
        • March 2023
        • July 2023
        • April 2023
        • May 2023
        • June 2023
  • FOR DIGITAL SUBSCRIPTION
  • BT AWARDS
    • BT Top 40
      • BT Top 40 2021 – 2022
    • BT Top 30
      • BT Top 30 2018 – 2019
    • BT Top 25
      • BT Top 25 2011 – 2012
      • BT Top 25 2012 – 2013
      • BT Top 25 2013 – 2014
    • BT Top 20
      • BT Top 20 2009 – 2010
      • BT Top 20 2010 – 2011
    • BT Top 10
      • BT Top 10 2008 – 2009
      • BT Top 10 2007 – 2008
      • BT Top 10 2006 – 2007
      • BT Top 10 2005 – 2006
      • BT Top 10 2003 – 2004
      • BT Top 10 2000 – 2001
      • BT Top 10 1999 – 2000
      • BT Top 10 1998 – 1999
      • BT Top 10 1997 – 1998
      • BT Top 10 1996 – 1997
      • BT Top 10 1995 – 1996
  • ABOUT US
No Result
View All Result
Business Today
No Result
View All Result

Sri Lanka goes ahead with Privatisation

in July 1996
0

by Lucien Rajakarunanayake

It is now clear that Sri Lanka which began the process of privatization in South Asia, at about the time Prime Minister Thatcher began it in the UK, is not ready to go back to the old policies of a centralized economy


The Government recently overcame one of the biggest obstacles to its programme of privatization. Using Emergency Powers and Essential Service regulations, it broke the backbone of an island-wide strike by electricity workers, which plunged the country into darkness and chaos. The tough tactics of the government leadership, combined with a more conciliatory and face-saving approach by back-bench members, saw power being fully restored in less than 72 hours.

The Government’s dealing with the strike by employees from the engineers to labour grade workers of the government-owned electricity monopoly, the Ceylon Electricity Board, certainly helped to bring added confidence in the private sector, that the government was serious about its policy of privatization. It also gave trade unions a message that the government, although accepting trade union rights, was not ready to allow trade unions to dictate government policy. Today, the Government of President Chandrika Kumaratunga is going ahead with its plans for the privatization of most state ventures.

The successful privatization of the state-owned Colombo Gas Company, the majority shares of which were bought by Shell International has given a boost to the government’s efforts at shedding off state ventures and giving the private sector the lead role in the economy. The sale of Colombo Gas to Shell International brought in a high-profile investor who bid over 25 million US dollars for the project, and who has also started a new joint venture to build an LP Gas terminal to the Colombo Harbour. It will help bring the fast selling LP gas in bulk, and not in cylinders as is done today, with the promise of making it available cheaper to the public. This new venture alone has an investment of 40 million US dollars.

The entire process of privatization is handled by the Public Enterprise Reform Commission (PERC), which in keeping with the Government’s policy of complete transparency in the process of privatization, ensures that all privatization activity gets the maximum publicity both in Sri Lanka and abroad, and is done according to guidelines which are made clear in pre-bid documents.

This is in marked contrast to the practice of the previous government, which initiated the privatization process, but carried out the business so secretly, that a large number of such privatized ventures are now the subject of special commissions of inquiry.

Also up for privatization is Air Lanka, Sri Lanka’s national carrier. A consortium of financial consultants led by Chase Manhattan, which has experience in the privatization of airlines, is already busy making the necessary financial recommendations for restructuring Air Lanka, before finding a strategic investor who will take up at least 49 per cent of the equity of the Government owned company. The report of the financial consultants is expected in the next few months.

Meanwhile, another consortium of international consultants has been selected and is busy on working out recommendations for the re-structuring and sale of part of the equity of Sri Lanka Telecom (SLT), the island’s state telecommunications monopoly The internation of the government, as announced,

Sri Lanka can have no future in the current economic context, unless it follows the prevailing trend in giving the private sector the major role in investment and development.

is to sell at least 20 per cent of equity of Sri Lanka Telecom initially, and proceed with share shedding in stages. There has been much trade union opposition to the privatization of SLT by most of the 31 trade unions within the organization. Recent developments have led to a break up of the unity among trade union opponents to the telecom restructuring and privatization effort. However, despite the many objections raised by the trade unions, the government certainly has the support of the public in this venture.

Applicants for telephones today have to wait from five to twelve years to get a connection. With a current waiting list of 220,000 applicants for telephones, the estimated applicants by the Year 2000 is at least 700.000, on a very conservative basis. At the current rate of giving telephone connections. which was 25.000 in 1995, it will go well into the first decade of the next Century, to meet the expected demand. The Government has therefore, already given licenses to two private companies with foreign collaboration to issue wireless loop telephone connections to applicants. Each company says they can give up to 40,000 connections per year. This will certainly ease the current pressure of the current demand for telecommunication services.

The giving of priority to telecommunications in the privatization process is an indicator of the government’s determination to of fer foreign investors an atmosphere with a good communications facility, which will help bring in high-tech investors to the country, moving away from the earlier emphasis on the garment manufacturers, and other low-tech projects.

President Chandrika Kumaratunga in a recent television interview made it clear that her government is committed to a capitalist economic programme, as opposed to the left-wing socialist programmes that her party, the Sri Lanka Freedom Party had been following when in power earlier. The President who has herself been one of the most ardent socialists within the Sri Lanka Freedom Party, appears to have come to the conclusion that Sri Lanka can have no future in the current economic context, unless it follows the prevailing trend in giving the private sector the major role in investment and development.

The President who is also the Minister of Finance, knows well the need for foreign capital for the development of Sri Lanka, and the gross inability to raise the capital required for modernization of the economy and create new employment through local private sector investment or by the government.

The plantation sector, which provides most of the tea that Sri Lanka is famous for the world over, as well as its rubber, which remains a major export, is also in the process of privatization. In this instance, it is a major about turn by the government. All foreign owned plantations were nationalized by Mrs. Sirimavo Bandaranaike, the mother of President Kumaratunga, when the mother was prime minister. What the daughter is seeking is to undo what her mother did, while the mother remains Prime Minister in her Cabinet.

At least three plantation groups which have been turned into profit under private management, have put their shares for sale in the Stock Exchange, with a fair measure of success.

The major difference in the present government’s approach to the plantations, is that it is ready to give the new investors a fifty year lease of the plantation, which will help them raise funds through the banking system. What the previous government did was to hand over the management of the plantations to companies which were its favourites. The net result was the stripping of the assets of the plantations on a large scale, for a short-term profit.

The first privatization of a plantation venture has brought more problems for the government through accusations of lack of transparency This is largely the problem of the small private sector for that is functional in the major sectors of the economy and the closely-knit connections between Various companies in the country, where conflict of interest could be a serious problem.

The government has now announced that it is re-thinking its strategy with regard to the privatization of plantations.

The Public Enterprise Reform Commission is clear in its policy that the any privatized plantation will not be used for any other purpose, except in relation to the plantation industry, once the 50-year lease is granted. The government has also decided that it will hold a golden share in the privatized plantation ventures to prevent the stripping of assets, the safeguarding of employee rights, and prevent the misuse of plantation assets for other economic ventures which could be more profitable in the short run.

At least three plantation groups which have been turned into profit under private management, have put their shares for sale in the Stock Exchange

The success of the government in the privatization of plantations will remain the key to its success in its broader policy of privatization. Already the government, acting through (PERC) has stopped the sale of some ventures such as Sri Lanka’s Duty Free Shopping Complex in the airport, when there were signs of an interested cartel under-bidding to get the business below the expected value. The move proved a success and later a consortium of investors bought the venture for more than the minimum value of One Billion Rupees.

Trade union objections would soften with the government’s decision that in any privatized venture its employees would be given at least ten per cent of the shares. Shell International has already done this and all the workers of the former Colombo Gas Company received shares valued at more than Rs 6000 at par. In order to assuage the fears of workers, the government is also insisting that the new investors do not carry out retrenchment in any of the privatized ventures, although the option of the golden hand-shake or that of re-training in new skills is kept open.

It is now clear that Sri Lanka which began the process of privatization in South Asia, at about the time Prime Minister Thatcher began it in the UK. is not ready to go back to the old policies of a centralized economy. Leading the privatization process today is the President, who at one time was among the most ardent supporters of state intervention and investment for development. She is now a clear convert to the new economic realities. Sri Lanka’s privatization process has the safety of continuance with more dynamism, because, as many would say, there is none so dedicated as one who is converted to new ideals.

Lucien Rajakarunanayake is a popular columnist, interviewer, and political commentator. He contributes regularly to all the major publications in English and Sinhalese. He is the correspondent in Sri Lanka for “The Observer”, UK. He is also Associate Creative Director of JWT, Colombo.
Please login to join discussion

Business Today August 2023

Business Today September 2023

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

© 2023 BT Options. All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • ISSUES
    • 1996 to 1999
      • 1996
      • 1997
    • 2000 to 2009
      • 2006
      • 2007
      • 2008
      • 2009
    • 2010 to 2019
      • 2010
      • 2011
      • 2012
      • 2013
      • 2014
      • 2015
      • 2016
      • 2017
      • 2018
      • 2019
    • 2020 to 2023
      • 2020
      • 2021
      • 2022
      • 2023
  • FOR DIGITAL SUBSCRIPTION
  • BT AWARDS
    • BT Top 40
      • BT Top 40 2021 – 2022
    • BT Top 30
      • BT Top 30 2018 – 2019
    • BT Top 25
      • BT Top 25 2011 – 2012
      • BT Top 25 2012 – 2013
      • BT Top 25 2013 – 2014
    • BT Top 20
      • BT Top 20 2009 – 2010
      • BT Top 20 2010 – 2011
    • BT Top 10
      • BT Top 10 2008 – 2009
      • BT Top 10 2007 – 2008
      • BT Top 10 2006 – 2007
      • BT Top 10 2005 – 2006
      • BT Top 10 2003 – 2004
      • BT Top 10 2000 – 2001
      • BT Top 10 1999 – 2000
      • BT Top 10 1998 – 1999
      • BT Top 10 1997 – 1998
      • BT Top 10 1996 – 1997
      • BT Top 10 1995 – 1996
  • ABOUT US

© 2023 BT Options. All Rights Reserved