Retail
Subscription
to Advertise
  • ISSUES
    • 1996 to 1999
      • 1996
        • May 1996
        • June 1996
        • July 1996
        • August 1996
        • September 1996
        • October 1996
        • November 1996
        • December 1996
      • 1997
    • 2000 to 2009
      • 2006
        • January 2006
        • February 2006
        • March 2006
        • April 2006
        • May 2006
        • June 2006
        • July 2006
        • August 2006
        • September 2006
        • October 2006
        • November 2006
        • December 2006
      • 2007
        • March 2007
        • April 2007
        • May 2007
        • July 2007
        • August 2007
        • September 2007
        • November 2007
        • December 2007
      • 2008
        • January 2008
        • February 2008
        • March 2008
        • April 2008
        • May 2008
        • June 2008
        • July 2008
        • August 2008
        • September 2008
        • October 2008
        • November 2008
        • December 2008
      • 2009
        • January 2009
        • February 2009
        • March 2009
        • April 2009
        • May 2009
        • June 2009
        • June 2009
        • July 2009
        • August 2009
        • September 2009
        • October 2009
        • November 2009
        • December 2009
    • 2010 to 2019
      • 2010
        • January 2010
        • February 2010
        • March 2010
        • April 2010
        • May 2010
        • June 2010
        • July 2010
        • August 2010
        • December 2010
      • 2011
        • January 2011
        • February 2011
        • March 2011
        • April 2011
        • May 2011
        • June 2011
        • July 2011
        • August 2011
        • September 2011
        • October 2011
        • November 2011
        • December 2011
      • 2012
        • January 2012
        • February 2012
        • March 2012
        • April 2012
        • May 2012
        • June 2012
        • July 2012
        • August 2012
        • September 2012
        • October 2012
        • November 2012
        • December 2012
      • 2013
        • January 2013
        • February 2013
        • March 2013
        • April 2013
        • May 2013
        • June 2013
        • July 2013
        • August 2013
        • September 2013
        • November 2013
        • December 2013
      • 2014
        • January 2014
        • February 2014
        • March 2014
        • April 2014
        • May 2014
        • June 2014
        • July 2014
        • August 2014
        • September 2014
        • October 2014
        • November 2014
        • December 2014
      • 2015
        • January 2015
        • February 2015
        • March 2015
        • April 2015
        • May 2015
        • June 2015
        • July 2015
        • August 2015
        • September 2015
        • October 2015
        • November 2015
        • December 2015
      • 2016
        • January 2016
        • February 2016
        • March 2016
        • April 2016
        • May 2016
        • June 2016
        • July 2016
        • August 2016
        • October 2016
        • November 2016
        • December 2016
      • 2017
        • January 2017
        • February 2017
        • March 2017
        • April 2017
        • May 2017
        • June 2017
        • July 2017
        • August 2017
        • September 2017
        • October 2017
        • November 2017
        • December 2017
      • 2018
        • January 2018
        • February 2018
        • March 2018
        • April 2018
        • May 2018
        • June 2018
        • July 2018
        • August 2018
        • September 2018
        • October 2018
        • November 2018
        • December 2018
      • 2019
        • January 2019
        • February 2019
        • March 2019
        • April 2019
        • May 2019
        • June 2019
        • July 2019
        • August 2019
        • September 2019
        • October 2019
        • November 2019
        • December 2019
    • 2020 to 2023
      • 2020
        • January 2020
        • February 2020
        • March 2020
        • April 2020
        • May 2020
        • June 2020
        • July 2020
        • August 2020
        • September 2020
        • October 2020
        • November 2020
        • December 2020
      • 2021
        • January 2021
        • February 2021
        • March 2021
        • April 2021
        • May 2021
        • June 2021
        • July 2021
        • August 2021
        • September 2021
        • October 2021
        • November 2021
        • December 2021
      • 2022
        • January 2022
        • June 2022
        • February 2022
        • July 2022
        • March 2022
        • April 2022
        • August 2022
        • May 2022
        • December 2022
      • 2023
        • January 2023
        • February 2023
        • March 2023
        • July 2023
        • April 2023
        • May 2023
        • June 2023
        • July 2023
        • August 2023
        • September 2023
        • October 2023
        • November 2023
  • FOR DIGITAL SUBSCRIPTION
  • BT AWARDS
    • BT Top 40
      • BT Top 40 2021 – 2022
    • BT Top 30
      • BT Top 30 2015 – 2016
      • BT Top 30 2016 – 2017
      • BT Top 30 2017 – 2018
      • BT Top 30 2018 – 2019
    • BT Top 25
      • BT Top 25 2011 – 2012
      • BT Top 25 2012 – 2013
      • BT Top 25 2013 – 2014
      • BT Top 25 2014 – 2015
    • BT Top 20
      • BT Top 20 2009 – 2010
      • BT Top 20 2010 – 2011
    • BT Top 10
      • BT Top 10 2008 – 2009
      • BT Top 10 2007 – 2008
      • BT Top 10 2006 – 2007
      • BT Top 10 2005 – 2006
      • BT Top 10 2003 – 2004
      • BT Top 10 2000 – 2001
      • BT Top 10 1999 – 2000
      • BT Top 10 1998 – 1999
      • BT Top 10 1997 – 1998
      • BT Top 10 1996 – 1997
      • BT Top 10 1995 – 1996
  • ABOUT US
No Result
View All Result
Business Today
No Result
View All Result

Mind Before Matter: Promoting Mahinda Rajapaksha as the Icon of a Nationalist Force

in January 2006
0

By J A S K Jayakody

Marketing is a profession which has gone beyond the ‘marketing of goods and services’. The contemporary marketer is active in marketing many different types of products including govern­ments, people and social issues. Al­though it is not foreign for a marketer in the developed world to accept an assignment of marketing people like athletes, singers or political candi­dates, it is an alien concept for m_any professional marketers in Sri Lanka. In this context, politicians seem to be the only category of people who are in one way or another marketed in Sri Lanka. Just a few months ago, Mr Jayantha Chandrasiri vividly dis­cussed the role of marketing, or more specifically that of advertising in poli­tics, in his film Guerrilla Marketing. It is true that ‘marketing’ appeared throughout the campaigns of b9th Mr Rajapaksha and Mr Wickremesinghe, though it is not clear as to what extent ‘marketers’ were involved in those campaigns. Therefore, it is worth­while for professional marketers as well as all others who are interested in marketing to see whether, as Mr Weerawansa repeatedly said, the UNP attempted to market an ‘un­marketable’ product or whether the marketers of the UNP failed to market a marketable product. On the same vein, it is also worth­while to see whether Mr Rajapaksha was ‘bought’ by the people or was made to be ‘bought’. The latter issue is what inspired this article. Therefore the focus of this article is the way that Mr Rajapaksha- the UPFA candidate that there is much more to learn from the UPFA campaign, not only for marketers, but also for voters. I believe that voters can learn how marketing induces certain behavior by analyzing Mr Rajapaksha’s campaign. It is my stance that voting for Mr Rajapaksha became a normative act for the majority of voters, as the UPFA campaign could create two psychologi­cal categories – namely the nationalist and the anti-nationalist – and elevate Mr Rajapaksha into an icon of the na­tionalist force against Mr Wickremes­inghe who was made to represent the anti-nationalists. The UPFA campaign could reach this end using two power­ful marketing tactics, namely sacraliza­tion and emotional appeal.

Manifesto Vs Candidate

In the case of a presidential candidate, the marketer is given two alternative product elements which can be pro­moted into the core product: the mani­festo and the candidate. Therefore, the marketers of a presidential candidate can promote either the manifesto, the candidate or both as the core product. If the marketers select one of them as the core, the remaining one can be promoted as the peripheral. However, if the marketers promote both as the core, then they will have to search for another product element as peripheral to reinforce the core. In the recent presidential election, I observed that the UNP promoted the manifesto of its candidate who essen­tially represented the party whereas the UPFA promoted the candidate himself while pushing both the party and the manifesto into the periphery. In other words, what the UPFA cam­paign wanted its voters to experience is neither the manifesto nor party, but Mr Rajapaksha. 

There were many possible reasons as well as advantages of promoting Mr Rajapaksha instead of the UPFA of which two are noteworthy. Firstly, Mr Rajapaksha could be ‘cleaned’ from whatever disgraces of the UPFA and the SLFP, whereas Mr Wickremesin­ghe, being ‘UNP’, had to carry all the disgraces of that party. Secondly, per­haps more importantly, a competitive advantage could be developed, as it was undoubtedly done, by crystalliz­ing Mr Rajapaksha’s own strength of a Sinhala Buddhist image. Towards this end, Mr Rajapaksha, the individual, was pulled into the limelight while pushing both his party and the mani­festo into the background. This was achieved mainly in three ways. Firstly, Mr Rajapaksha was sepa­rated from the UPFA and SLFP and was promoted as the ‘common candi­date’ (‘of common people’). In fact, Mr Rajapaksha could be easily separated from the party due to the distance made to be seen between himself and crucial national issues such as P-TOMS throughout the last regime. Secondly, the manifesto was made to be Mr Ra­japaksha’s vision and aspiration rather than that of the UPFA, and made to be something that was presented to the na­tion by Mr Rajapaksha himself instead of by his party. Thus Mr Rajapaksha was praised for his experience, practi­cality and his feeling toward the com­mon man and woman in creating the ‘Mahinda Chinthana’. This is why Mrs Bandaranaike’s emphasis on a united country as the SLFP policy as well as Mr Wickremesinghe’s appeal to vot­ers of the SLFP to consider its policy, were not heard. Thirdly, the majority of promotional materials and events, including the launch of his biography, were used to build an image for Mr Ra­japaksha rather than to communicate ‘promises’ in the manifesto. This is why people were not receptive to not having the promises of ‘Mahinda Chinthana’ in the budget, which was promoted as the ‘Mahinda Chinthana’ budget.

Despite the popular belief that marketers can only sell products, the marketer can also mould the psyche. 

Mr Rajapaksa’s campaign is a testimony to the ability of marketers, who cast both the product and the consumers’s psych to their advantage.

Anti-Nationalist Vs Nationalist

There are certain key issues that should be appropriately addressed by any marketer in his/her attempt to position his/her product, despite whether it is a bottle of carbonated drink or the prospective head of gov­ernment. Among them, two issues are noteworthy.

Firstly, the marketer has to decide a location of psyche, where he/she will place the product. Secondly, the marketer has to decide the content and the form of the product, which fits into that location of consumers’ psyche. Despite popular belief that the marketers can make only products, the marketers can also make psyche or a particular location of psyche as well. Mr Rajapaksha’s campaign is a testimony to the ability of marketers casting both the product and the con­sumers’ psyche for their advantage.

The campaign was able to create two psychological categories, which I shall name as nationalist and anti-na­tionalist, and which were essentially dialectical. In fact, these two began to emerge some time back with the inception of what I shall name as the ‘Contemporary Radical Sinhalese Buddhist Movement’ by some Colombo based Buddhist monks. Though, there are many facets of this movement, it essentially revolves around ‘contemporarization’ of Bud­dhism in order to match Buddhism to the contemporary society or to meet the present-day responsibilities of Buddhists. The first facet is less po­litical and oriented more towards the ‘core’ of Buddhism, while the second one is highly political; by political, I mean power and change orientation, and oriented more towards sacred­ness of Sinhalese Buddhist.

The JHU can be taken as one which represents this second facet. This second facet also closely aligns with another con­temporary development, which I shall name as ‘nationalism’; mainly incepted by the JVP together with some Buddhist monks, some artists and some intellectuals. Nationalism contains ideologies like ‘anti-separa­tism’ and ‘national economy’ against the globalization of capitalism. The psychological category I named as ‘nationalist’ is the characterization of both the second facet of the ‘Contem­porary Radical Sinhalese Buddhist Movement’ and ‘nationalism’. There­fore, it essentially embraces both the sacredness of Sinhalese Buddhists as well as nationalism and clearly sets apart from the anti-nationalist. However, it should be noted that the intensity of both the politically oriented sacred Sinhalese Buddhist facet and nationalism seemed to be lessened in this campaign compared to the last parliamentary election. Further, it is also noteworthy to re­count the attempt of the UPFA cam­paign to classify ‘religious’ Catholics and Christians as nationalists while distinguishing them from missionar­ies.

The anti-nationalist psychologi­cal category embraces ideologies like separatism, missionaries, anti-Sin­halese Buddhist culture or more of ‘Indianization’ as well as business media culture. The UPFA campaign grouped forces or parties like for­eigners or foreign countries, specially Norway who are said to support sep­aratism, the UNP, LTTE, NGOs who were labelled as their local agents, private media stations, missionaries, businessmen who were said to sup­port missionaries, artists who were labelled as lapai sypai artists as well as minority politicians who were said to be money oriented.

Having created these two psy­chological categories, the campaign showed Mr Rajapaksha as the icon of the nationalist force while showing Mr Wickremesinghe as the agent of the entire anti-nationalist forces. In other words, Mr Rajapaksha and Mr Wickremesinghe were constructed in a manner that fit into the e two psychological categories which are essentially antagonistic. However, since the focal point of this article is Mr Rajapaksha, how his campaign promoted Mr Rajapaksha into the icon of nationalist force will be discussed. Firstly, it should be noted that the campaign promoted Mr Rajapaksha into such an icon based on the Sinhala Buddhist image he already had to some extent. In fact, this particular attribute became known as, if put it in theoreti­cal language, distinctive competence – the assets or the competence that is unique to a firm or an individual. The campaign capitalized on this im­age in promoting Mr Rajapaksha into the icon of the nationalist force and in setting him apart from his major com­petitor, Mr Wickremesinghe, to whom the campaign created the image of the agent of the entire anti-nationalist forces. Since the images created for Mr Rajapaksha and Mr Wickremesinghe as the nationalist and anti-nationalist respectively were so plain, i.e., ‘good’ and ‘bad’, that Mr Wickremesinghe became the antagonistic opposite of Mr Rajapaksha. This characterization was so vibrant that the comparative weaknesses of Mr Rajapaksha and comparative strengths of Mr Wick­remesinghe were forgotten by the voters in the final comparison. It appeared that the campaign could reach this end as it was capable of sacralizing Mr Rajapaksha in high­ly emotional fashion. Certainly, there were many reasons for the success of this strategy, which combined sacra­lization and emotional appeal against the more rationalistic approach taken by the UNP campaign. Among them, the ability of these two approaches to fit into the sentimental aspect of Sri Lankans is noteworthy. Further, since the UPFA campaign could target one segment rather than many dispersed segments, which was the case for the UNP campaign, casting such a solid image for Mr Rajapaksha was made easier.

Rational Vs Emotional

Appeal In general, the UPFA campaign was more experiential than informative whereas the UNP campaign was the other way around. However, before presenting the ‘evidence’ to support this argument, I believe it is worthwhile to clarify what I mean by ‘informative’ and ‘experiential’. People can be viewed as rational, experiential, or a combination. As rational beings, humans are assumed to be goal oriented and concerned about economic benefits. Further, they attempt to reach their goal by collecting and processing information logically. On the other hand, as experiential beings, it is assumed that humans are influenced more by culture, status, esteem and fantasy, and are oriented towards symbolic and subjective aspects of behavior such as feelings, emotions, sensory pleasures and fantasies. A customer, who is oriented to be rational is more analytical and looks for details in his/her consumption decisions. In contrast, a customer who is experien­tially oriented is less analytical and comfortable with abstract, holistic experiences. In general, consumers in this part of the world are said to be more experiential in their consump­tion, thus are more responsive to emotional appeals. Therefore the Sri Lankan consumer would be more at­tracted by an emotional appeal than by a rational one.

Now we can look at how the UPFA campaign made voters experi­ence its candidate – Mr Rajapaksha. Though there were many promo­tional materials through which the people were made to experience Mr Rajapaksha, I recall only few of them, including the poster which depicts that the kurahan satakaya crossed over Sri Lanka. The same was used in a TV commercial, and there it was shown floating around the country. Both would create a feeling that the country is secured. The launch of ‘Mahinda Chinthana’ was also closer to the hearts of the people than to their minds. TV commercials in which the candidate appeared were less inform­ative, and were full of cultural icons such as betel leaves, lotus, paddy fields and Buddha statues as well as status symbols like the Walauwa, Ma­hagedera, Temple Trees, etc. Though our focus here is Mr Rajapaksha, it should be noted that even the promo­tional materials in his manifesto were more emotional. For instance, a TV commercial which depicts the Aluth Sri Lankawak (a new Sri Lanka), using computer graphics, shows in a highly emotional fashion how skyscrapers, highways etc, would emerge in that new Sri Lanka.

Sacralization of Mr Rajapaksa

The second aspect of the strategy adopted by the UPFA campaign is sacralization – association of its can­didate with sacred objects and events. Sacralization is supposed to be a more effective way of marketing products to contemporary consumers who ex­perience an ‘identity crisis’, and are worried about the lost sacred past and the profane today. Contemporary Sri Lankan consumers, including the Sri Lankan voters, experience a dilemma as they are fond of both the sacred life that they had and their present conspicuously consumption lifestyle. As these two desires contradict each other, the identity of contemporary consumers seems to be fragmented in various degrees, depending on their origin, and thus the consumers experi­ence never-ending anxiety throughout their lives. The preaching of ‘national­ism’ including the so-called national economy seems to be an indicator of this identity crisis. What all these nationalistic movements, including the UPFA campaign, promise the consumers is the restoration of the sacred epoch within the conspicuous consump­tions of the present day consumers. As a result, nationalistic movements treat or attempt to treat any object, event, person or time which belongs to that sacred epoch with utmost respect and reverence. Similarly, the consumers eager to restore their lost sacred past within their consumption lifestyles tend to treat those objects, events, people or time with utmost respect and reverence. Not only that, any profane object or person who is made to be associated with these sacred things will also be treated with the same level of respect and reverence. Then the question is what sacred object, event, people or time was Mr Rajapaksha associated with to make him be perceived as the icon of the nationalist force. It seems that every­thing that can be utilized to do so was used in the UPFA campaign. Sacra­lization of signing the Memorandum of Understanding with the JVP and JHU and the launch of ‘Mahinda Chinthana’ was evident through as­sociating those events with tradition­al customs, the Temple of the Tooth relic, the discourse between Mihindu Thero and King Devanampiyatissa, the arrival of Mihindu Thero, etc, and the campaign utilized paddy fields, kevita (the stick used to drive the cattle), traditional costume includ­ing the Kurahan satakaya, family, and finally, the moustache of a Sri Lankan father.

To illustrate how carefully Mr Ra­japaksha was marketed, I would like to draw your attention to the way he was ‘dressed’ during the campaign. It was clearly evident that the ‘market­ers’ of Mr Rajapaksha were careful not to reveal him in his usual attire a Chinese collar shirt with trousers – which would damage their attempt to cast him as the icon of the national­ist force.

The UPFA campaign not only sacralized Mr Rajapaksha, but also promoted Mr Wickremesinghe as an enemy, or at least a deviant of ‘sa­cred Sri Lanka’. The UPF A campaign used sacred objects, people and ep­och, or at least what was promoted as sacred, to cast an anti-national­ist image for Mr Wickremesinghe. For instance, the UPFA campaign utilized the traditional farmer, pa­godas constructed by ancient kings, an epoch of history, etc to construct an anti-nationalist image for the UNP candidate. Since people who are making an uneasy attempt to merge both the past sacred life and present conspicuously consumption lifestyle treat these with utmost reverence and respect, they tend to treat any act leading to displace the sacredness of these objects, people and history as immoral. This is why people could be made to perceive the UNP’s promise of building the largest pagoda as an immoral act of an anti-nationalist. Similarly, the notion of the ‘modern farmer’ could be seen as an abusive act of an anti-nationalist. This is why the UNP could be made to be viewed as anti-nationalist and not having its roots in a ‘sacred Sri Lanka’. In addition, the campaign em­ployed Juthaka bamuna, which is found in Buddhist folk literature and Prince Don Juan Dharmapala to cast anti­nationalist as well as a ‘black’ image for Mr Wickremesinghe. It should be noted that the Juthaka bamuna is treated as the ugliest and most hated figure in the minds of Sinhala Buddhists while the latter is viewed as a weak and tamed ruler of the anti-nationalist. The ultimate result of promoting Mr Rajapaksha as the icon of nationalist force while casting the image of an anti-nationalist for Mr Wickremesinghe was that voting for Mr Rajapaksha became a normative act for many voters.

Psyche of Voters

The psychological dynamics result­ing from the creation of the two psychological categories which are essentially dialectical should be understood in light of its relation to what is known as social categoriza­tions. Social categorization refers to the tendency of an individual to dichotomize people, including him/her into groups in terms of any momentarily meaningful social categories. Further, people tend to perceive these social categories that possess esteem in different degrees; thus in general, people like to be members of high esteem social cat­egories. Also, people are afraid of becoming members of low esteem social categories. The two psychological categories – nationalist and anti-nationalist- were created in a manner that the national­ist social category is perceived to be having high regard or esteem while the anti-nationalist is perceived to be having low esteem. The nationalist was made to be in the high esteem social category, which was evoked using high-esteem symbols such as the Temple of the Tooth relic, the discourse between Mihindu Thero and King Devanampiyatissa and the arrival of Mihidu Thero. On the other hand, the low esteem symbols such as Juthaka bamuna and Prince Don Juan Dharmapala were assigned to the anti-nationalist. Further, the national­ist/ anti-nationalist ideology became a momentarily meaningful criterion of dichotomizing the people as the people have been perceived: firstly, as a threat against the Sinhalese and secondly, as a threat against Sinhala Buddhists. However, people were not permit­ted to use their free will in this social categorization, as this dichotomizing too was made by the UPF A campaign by grouping different types of people into the nationalist and anti-nation-alist forces. The UPFA campaign grouped Buddhists, the JHU, JVP, artists, intellectuals, Catholics and Christians into the nationalist social category which has high esteem. As said previously, foreigners or foreign countries, specially Norway, the UNP, LTTE, NGOs, private media stations, missionaries, businessmen, artists as well as minority politicians were grouped into the anti-national­ist social category which essentially possesses low esteem. In general, people aspire to be­long to a high esteem social category while avoiding a low esteem one, and as mentioned above, the social categories were clearly dichotomized whereby people did not have to think twice in selecting a social category to be part of. Therefore, voting for Mr Rajapaksha who was elevated into the icon of nationalist force became a normative act, as it is what allows people to belong to a high esteem social category. Further, it should be noted that the anti-nationalist social force which is low esteem was per­ceived to be real and more coherent, people felt fear of becoming a member of it, and thus voting for it became an act of immorality. 

I advocate marketers, including marketers of future presidential candidates, not to undermine the power of the competitor’s marketing communication, at least when the competitor’s marketing communication is truly persuasive.

The Dark Side of Marketing

Going back to an olden day issue of nationalist/anti-nationalist but which in some way reappeared with the identity crisis created by discourses of ‘contemporarization’ of Buddhism, conspicuous consump­tion and globalization, the UPFA presidential campaign transformed the voters’ decision, what should es­sentially be high involvement, into a low involvement one. The voters’ decision was made to simply choose between Mr Rajapaksha who led the national force and Mr Wickreme in­ghe who represents the anti-national­ist force. If the voters are asked why they voted for Mr Rajapak ha, one can realize the extent to which the campaign was capable of ‘blocking’ the voters’ decision-making process. There was no need of evaluation of candidates, selection of appropriate criteria or collection of information, as the campaign could make the decision on behalf of the voters. By doing so, the campaign distracted the voters away from important issues such as peace, inflation and unemployment, which were the focus of the UNP campaign. Though ‘playing’ with emotions would be an excellent strategy to win the ‘game’, it may not be good for the future of the country.

As long as future politics is con­cerned, what is dangerous in this campaign is its ability to create two clear psychological categories, which may essentially symbolize ‘good’ and ‘bad’. They are nationalist and anti­nationalist. If these two psychologi­cal categories firmly establish (or are established) among the voters, what is needed to defeat President Rajapak­sha, who has been classified into the nationalist category, is to reclassify him into the anti-nationalist category. As this category is essentially ‘bad’, or even ‘evil’, no voter would want to vote for him and would probably move towards anyone who appears to be a nationalist, as it is what the voters have been made to believe is most normative.

This is not a difficult endeavor for a marketer, as marketing is nothing more than ‘playing with the mind and heart of customers’. By defining mar­keting as ‘playing with the mind and heart’, I do not take the stance that ‘a good salesperson can sell anything he/he wants to sell’. However, I ad­vocate marketers, including market­er of future presidential candidates, not to undermine the power of the competitor’s marketing communica­tion, at least when the competitor’s marketing communication is truly persuasive. 

Business Today December 2023

business-today-logo

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

© 2023 BT Options. All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • ISSUES
    • 1996 to 1999
      • 1996
      • 1997
    • 2000 to 2009
      • 2006
      • 2007
      • 2008
      • 2009
    • 2010 to 2019
      • 2010
      • 2011
      • 2012
      • 2013
      • 2014
      • 2015
      • 2016
      • 2017
      • 2018
      • 2019
    • 2020 to 2023
      • 2020
      • 2021
      • 2022
      • 2023
  • FOR DIGITAL SUBSCRIPTION
  • BT AWARDS
    • BT Top 40
      • BT Top 40 2021 – 2022
    • BT Top 30
      • BT Top 30 2015 – 2016
      • BT Top 30 2016 – 2017
      • BT Top 30 2017 – 2018
      • BT Top 30 2018 – 2019
    • BT Top 25
      • BT Top 25 2011 – 2012
      • BT Top 25 2012 – 2013
      • BT Top 25 2013 – 2014
      • BT Top 25 2014 – 2015
    • BT Top 20
      • BT Top 20 2009 – 2010
      • BT Top 20 2010 – 2011
    • BT Top 10
      • BT Top 10 2008 – 2009
      • BT Top 10 2007 – 2008
      • BT Top 10 2006 – 2007
      • BT Top 10 2005 – 2006
      • BT Top 10 2003 – 2004
      • BT Top 10 2000 – 2001
      • BT Top 10 1999 – 2000
      • BT Top 10 1998 – 1999
      • BT Top 10 1997 – 1998
      • BT Top 10 1996 – 1997
      • BT Top 10 1995 – 1996
  • ABOUT US

© 2023 BT Options. All Rights Reserved