Retail
Subscription
to Advertise
  • ISSUES
    • 1996 to 1999
      • 1996
        • June 1996
        • July 1996
    • 2000 to 2009
      • 2006
        • January 2006
        • February 2006
        • March 2006
        • April 2006
        • May 2006
        • June 2006
        • July 2006
        • August 2006
        • September 2006
        • October 2006
        • November 2006
        • December 2006
      • 2007
        • January 2007
        • February 2007
        • March 2007
        • April 2007
        • May 2007
        • June 2007
        • July 2007
        • August 2007
        • September 2007
        • October 2007
        • November 2007
        • December 2007
      • 2008
        • January 2008
        • February 2008
        • March 2008
        • April 2008
        • May 2008
        • June 2008
        • July 2008
        • August 2008
        • September 2008
        • October 2008
        • November 2008
        • December 2008
      • 2009
        • January 2009
        • February 2009
        • March 2009
        • April 2009
        • May 2009
        • June 2009
        • July 2009
        • August 2009
        • September 2009
        • October 2009
        • November 2009
        • December 2009
    • 2010 to 2019
      • 2010
        • January 2010
        • February 2010
        • March 2010
        • April 2010
        • May 2010
        • June 2010
        • July 2010
        • August 2010
        • December 2010
      • 2011
        • January 2011
        • February 2011
        • March 2011
        • April 2011
        • May 2011
        • June 2011
        • July 2011
        • August 2011
        • September 2011
        • October 2011
        • November 2011
        • December 2011
      • 2012
        • January 2012
        • February 2012
        • March 2012
        • April 2012
        • May 2012
        • June 2012
        • July 2012
        • August 2012
        • September 2012
        • October 2012
        • November 2012
        • December 2012
      • 2013
        • January 2013
        • February 2013
        • March 2013
        • April 2013
        • May 2013
        • June 2013
        • July 2013
        • August 2013
        • September 2013
        • November 2013
        • December 2013
      • 2014
        • January 2014
        • February 2014
        • March 2014
        • April 2014
        • May 2014
        • June 2014
        • July 2014
        • August 2014
        • September 2014
        • October 2014
        • November 2014
        • December 2014
      • 2015
        • January 2015
        • February 2015
        • March 2015
        • April 2015
        • May 2015
        • June 2015
        • July 2015
        • August 2015
        • September 2015
        • October 2015
        • November 2015
        • December 2015
      • 2016
        • January 2016
        • February 2016
        • March 2016
        • April 2016
        • May 2016
        • June 2016
        • July 2016
        • August 2016
        • October 2016
        • November 2016
        • December 2016
      • 2017
        • January 2017
        • February 2017
        • March 2017
        • April 2017
        • May 2017
        • June 2017
        • July 2017
        • August 2017
        • September 2017
        • October 2017
        • November 2017
        • December 2017
      • 2018
        • January 2018
        • February 2018
        • March 2018
        • April 2018
        • May 2018
        • June 2018
        • July 2018
        • August 2018
        • September 2018
        • October 2018
        • November 2018
        • December 2018
      • 2019
        • January 2019
        • February 2019
        • March 2019
        • April 2019
        • May 2019
        • June 2019
        • July 2019
        • August 2019
        • September 2019
        • October 2019
        • November 2019
        • December 2019
    • 2020 to 2023
      • 2020
        • January 2020
        • February 2020
        • March 2020
        • April 2020
        • May 2020
        • June 2020
        • July 2020
        • August 2020
        • September 2020
        • October 2020
        • November 2020
        • December 2020
      • 2021
        • January 2021
        • February 2021
        • March 2021
        • April 2021
        • May 2021
        • June 2021
        • July 2021
        • August 2021
        • September 2021
        • October 2021
        • November 2021
        • December 2021
      • 2022
        • January 2022
        • June 2022
        • February 2022
        • July 2022
        • March 2022
        • April 2022
        • August 2022
        • May 2022
        • October 2022
        • November 2022
        • December 2022
      • 2023
        • January 2023
        • February 2023
        • March 2023
        • April 2023
        • May 2023
        • June 2023
  • FOR DIGITAL SUBSCRIPTION
  • BT AWARDS
    • BT Top 40 2021 – 2022
  • ABOUT US
No Result
View All Result
Business Today
No Result
View All Result

How to do long-term

0 0
0

By Dinesh Weerakkody

Long term cash and stock based compensation has become standard fare for most private sector companies in their drive to attract, retain and motive top executives. As a result many senior executives in Sri Lanka today participate in various forms of long term incentive programs that are normally based upon individual and company performance. These long-term incentive plans, particu-larly equity participation, have always been an important component of executive reward and compensation. The stagnant economy, shortage of executive talent, and MNC influence in the market over the last few years has created interest in long-term incentives; most private companies are now using long-term cash and stock based rewards to compensate their executives. Most companies in Sri Lanka who have introduced such schemes company wide without a detailed review of a company’s executives reward system with tax, legal, and human resource are finding it difficult to sustain the incentive program in the medium and long term. Any reward package selected must be designed to motivate its key executives to accomplish the company’s key success factors, while at the same time fulfilling the executive’s extrinsic and intrinsic needs of rewards and recognition. There are generally three objectives accomplished with
a well-designed long-term compensation plan. The first objective is the attraction, motivation and retention of skilled senior executives. The second objectives is the alignment of the personal interests of those executives with the interests of the shareholder, thereby forging a strong link between performance and compensation and providing an incentive to increase share holder value. Finally, the plan should be tax-effective; that is, it should defer and possibly even reduce the incidence of taxation on executive compensation. 

Tax Effectiveness

Tax effectiveness is critical to the design and operation of long-term compensation plans, failing which the actual and perceived value of the plan to participants will get significantly reduced. There are many innovative variations in long-tern compensa­tion; however, the most commonly employed plans are briefly described below. These alternatives are not mutually exclusive and could be used in combination as a “mezzanine” plan.

Although a detailed discussion is beyond the scope of this article, among the most important tax issues to be resolved are the provisions of the income tax act that deals with the salary deferral arra’ngements and the availability of a deduction to the employer. Naturally, the relevance of these issues in any situation will depend upon the nature and design of the plan.

Salary Deferral Arrangements

The first category of long-term incentive plans involves agreements pursuant to which the employer undertakes to make a future payment in respect of cur­rent services, with the objective of deferring the related tax liability. The amount payable typically bears some relation to an increase in share value and the payment may take the form of cash or shares. The amount paid must depend upon the average market value of shares of the capital stock of the employer company. In addi­tion, the arrangement may not contain any provision intended to provide shelter from a decline in the fair market value of the employer’s shares. These plans are often described as full value phantom stock plans and taxed as income from office or employment rather than as a capital gain. In some countries the employer will be entitled to a deduction in respect of amounts paid.

Phantom Stock Plan
A phantom stock plan is essentially a special type of deferred bonus arrangement, usually based on the fair market value of the shares of the employer company. Such plans do not involve the actual issu­ance of shares of ownership of equity by employees. Rather, phantom plans involve the creation of units that shadow the current fair market value of the employer company shares. In situations where private companies are involved, units will appreciate or depreciate based on defined factors, such as, for example, the increase in return on investment, the achievement of profits on a consistent basis in excess of budgets, including corporate, divisional and personal performance. The units typically have no value at the time of award but may subsequently acquire value. Such plans provide for vesting after a given period of time and typically provide for forfeiture in the event of dismissal. At the time of vesting, a calculation is made of the value of the accumulated units and such amounts are then paid to the employee as a bonus. It is also typical for additional units to be created when dividends are paid on the shares of the company. It should be noted that the pay­ment to the employee is taxed as cash compensation, and does not involve any special tax considerations. No actual share issuance occurs; therefore any amount to the employee will be taxed.

Stock Options

Another category and perhaps the most common form of long-term incentive plan is the stock option. The traditional stock option plan involves extending to the employee a right to acquire shares of the employer for an exercise price that is projected to be less than the fair market value of those shares at the time of acquisition. Typically such rights do not vest until a specific period of time after their grant. No deduction is generally available to the employer company in respect of the provision of stock option benefits. From the employee’s perspective, there are generally no immediate tax consequences on the grant of an employee stock option.

Share Appreciation Rights (SAR)

As an alternative to stock options some MNCs develop an employee remuneration plan which is based on the performance of the company’s stock while retaining deductibility to the employer. This stock right is essentially a hybrid between a traditional stock plan and a phantom stock plan and combines the tax benefits of both types of plans. The basic SAR enables the employee to choose to exercise either the SAR or the option. If the employee elects to exercise the SAR or the option a cash payment will be made equal to the difference between the fair market value of the optioned stock and the option price. The employee will concurrently surrender the rights under the option.

Conclusion

The list of plans described above is by no means exhaustive. With the myriad of options available, the development of an appropriate long-term incentive plan for a particular company is challenging and the ef­fectiveness of the plan will depend on the capability of the firm’s Human Resources and Finance Department. An innovative approach to plan design and delivery could involve the use of a ‘cafeteria plan’ similar to the approach commonly used to deliver employee benefits. This strategy enables the executive to tailor his or her long-term compensation to suit individual circum­stances. Consequently, greater value is delivered and the three objectives described before are most likely to be met. Today, long-term compensation plans are critical to structuring competitive remuneration pack­ages for the executives of private sector companies. The cafeteria approach to delivery represents an innovative new application of existing principles. 

TweetShareShare

Business Today June 2023

Business Today

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

© 2023 BT Options. All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • ISSUES
    • 1996 to 1999
      • 1996
    • 2000 to 2009
      • 2006
      • 2007
      • 2008
      • 2009
    • 2010 to 2019
      • 2010
      • 2011
      • 2012
      • 2013
      • 2014
      • 2015
      • 2016
      • 2017
      • 2018
      • 2019
    • 2020 to 2023
      • 2020
      • 2021
      • 2022
      • 2023
  • FOR DIGITAL SUBSCRIPTION
  • BT AWARDS
    • BT Top 40 2021 – 2022
  • ABOUT US

© 2023 BT Options. All Rights Reserved

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In