Retail
Subscription
to Advertise
  • ISSUES
    • 2006 to 2009
      • 2006
        • January 2006
        • February 2006
        • March 2006
        • April 2006
        • May 2006
        • June 2006
        • July 2006
        • August 2006
        • September 2006
        • October 2006
        • November 2006
        • December 2006
      • 2007
        • January 2007
        • February 2007
        • March 2007
        • April 2007
        • May 2007
        • June 2007
        • July 2007
        • August 2007
        • September 2007
        • October 2007
        • November 2007
        • December 2007
      • 2008
        • January 2008
        • February 2008
        • March 2008
        • April 2008
        • May 2008
        • June 2008
        • July 2008
        • August 2008
        • September 2008
        • October 2008
        • November 2008
        • December 2008
      • 2009
        • January 2009
        • February 2009
        • March 2009
        • April 2009
        • May 2009
        • June 2009
        • July 2009
        • August 2009
        • September 2009
        • October 2009
        • November 2009
        • December 2009
    • 2010 to 2019
      • 2010
        • January 2010
        • February 2010
        • March 2010
        • April 2010
        • May 2010
        • June 2010
        • July 2010
        • August 2010
        • September 2010
        • October 2010
        • November 2010
        • December 2010
      • 2011
        • January 2011
        • February 2011
        • March 2011
        • April 2011
        • May 2011
        • June 2011
        • July 2011
        • August 2011
        • September 2011
        • October 2011
        • November 2011
        • December 2011
      • 2012
        • April 2013
        • June 2012
        • July 2012
        • September 2012
      • 2013
        • January 2013
        • February 2013
        • March 2013
        • April 2013
        • May 2013
        • June 2013
        • July 2013
        • August 2013
        • November 2013
        • December 2013
      • 2014
        • January 2014
        • February 2014
        • March 2014
        • April 2014
        • May 2014
        • June 2014
        • July 2014
        • August 2014
        • September 2014
        • October 2014
        • November 2014
        • December 2014
      • 2015
        • January 2015
        • February 2015
        • March 2015
        • April 2015
        • May 2015
        • June 2015
        • July 2015
        • August 2015
        • September 2015
        • October 2015
        • November 2015
        • December 2015
      • 2016
        • January 2016
        • February 2016
        • March 2016
        • April 2016
        • May 2016
        • June 2016
        • July 2016
        • August 2016
        • October 2016
        • November 2016
        • December 2016
      • 2017
        • January 2017
        • February 2017
        • March 2017
        • April 2017
        • May 2017
        • June 2017
        • July 2017
        • August 2017
        • September 2017
        • October 2017
        • November 2017
        • December 2017
      • 2018
        • January 2018
        • February 2018
        • March 2018
        • April 2018
        • May 2018
        • June 2018
        • July 2018
        • August 2018
        • September 2018
        • October 2018
        • November 2018
        • December 2018
      • 2019
        • January 2019
        • February 2019
        • March 2019
        • April 2019
        • May 2019
        • June 2019
        • July 2019
        • August 2019
        • September 2019
        • October 2019
        • November 2019
        • December 2019
    • 2020 to 2023
      • 2020
        • January 2020
        • February 2020
        • March 2020
        • April 2020
        • May 2020
        • June 2020
        • July 2020
        • August 2020
        • September 2020
        • October 2020
        • November 2020
        • December 2020
      • 2021
        • January 2021
        • February 2021
        • March 2021
        • April 2021
        • May 2021
        • June 2021
        • July 2021
        • August 2021
        • September 2021
        • October 2021
        • November 2021
        • December 2021
      • 2022
        • January 2022
        • June 2022
        • February 2022
        • July 2022
        • March 2022
        • April 2022
        • August 2022
        • May 2022
        • September 2022
        • October 2022
        • November 2022
        • December 2022
      • 2023
        • January 2023
        • February 2023
        • March 2023
        • April 2023
        • May 2023
  • FOR DIGITAL SUBSCRIPTION
  • BT AWARDS
    • BT Top 40 2021 – 2022
  • ABOUT US
No Result
View All Result
Business Today
No Result
View All Result

How Strategic Is Your Strategy?

0 0
0

The word STRATEGY has become colloquial in usage today; as a word loosely used today, and also commonly used in places where it should not be. Often when we need to perform a task or improve something, we use the phrase ‘We must have a STRATEGY’.  

By ASANGA RANASINGHE
President of CIM Sri Lanka
Executive Director/Chief Marketing Officer of Diesel & Motor Engineering


However, STRATEGY has a broader and deeper meaning than its current use. Its intended purpose is very different from current understanding. This diffused knowledge results in a negative impact on some of the practices, thinking processes and actions adopted by leaders and their teams in organisations today.


In fact, some leaders and teams go to the extent of complaining that STRATEGY has no bearing on business results and blame STRATEGY.


In my opinion, the primary reason is due to leaders lacking in understanding of the notion of STRATEGY, and also they do not act on the wisdom and teachings of STRATEGY.


Thus, this article aims to clarify the basics of STRATEGY and help leaders craft and execute a STRATEGY to win, especially in the market place.


Firstly, let us focus on a basic question, which we often do not ask – ‘What is a STRATEGY?’

What Is STRATEGY? Many Are Under The Perception That STRATEGY Is All About Making Improvements. However, Is It Not True That Improvements Are Essential To Enhance Productivity And Day-To-Day Activities?

STRATEGY: IS IT OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS?


What is STRATEGY? Many are under the perception that STRATEGY is all about making improvements. However, is it not true that improvements are essential to enhance productivity and day-to-day activities?


None would concur that we should not make improvements to what we do daily. We must relentlessly strive to improve what we did yesterday, today and continue tomorrow.


This is Operational Effectiveness (OE). It is about doing things more effectively and/or efficiently today than yesterday. OE needs to be embedded in the workings of an organisation, and it is something we need to do every day.


Management tools and techniques such as Total Quality Management, Total Productive Maintenance, 5S, 6-Sigma will undoubtedly have a significant impact on improving business operations and processes and yield good results.


Moreover, some consultants and companies can assist businesses to implement these programs. However, all that is available to one company is also available to all others, and the only differentiating factor will be the level of execution. This kind of operational effectiveness and improvements in doing things better is necessary but not sufficient to compete in today’s highly competitive market.


It is widely accepted that the business world has never been as complex as it is today; customers are becoming savvy, and rivalry among competitors is getting intense daily. Hence being better or being the best is necessary but not sufficient for long term value creation. Businesses must strive to be unique or different to create value consistently for customers, employees and shareholders. Sadly, leaders of today are mindlessly focused to be the best and to beat the competition by concentrating only on OE as the driver of creating superior value.


While engaging in benchmarking, they become more indistinguishable. Businesses become similar, and they lose their individuality. In other words, when more things are done in terms of improvements such as outsourcing, the outsourcing company improves in terms of job performance and the businesses becomes more generic vis-à-vis the competitors.


That uniqueness of the business or the differentiator is lost when the focus is relentlessly to beat the competitor especially by trying to be better through OE. Companies need to improve operational efficiency every day, but this should not be its ‘STRATEGY’.


Therein lies the difference between Operational Effectiveness and STRATEGY. Operational Effectiveness is all about trying to perform the Value Chain Activities more efficiently and effectively than competitors. When a business becomes better than its rivals in its value chain, it is called improving Operational Effectiveness. STRATEGY, however, is not about being better; instead, it is about being different.

STRATEGY Is Doing Things Differently And Doing Different Things To Achieve A Sustainable Competitive Advantage.

WHAT IS A STRATEGY?


STRATEGY is doing things differently and doing different things to achieve a sustainable competitive advantage. Though simple, it is not well understood.


STRATEGY is not about doing things better. STRATEGY is the creation of a unique position – a position in the minds of the customers and other stakeholders. Dilmah, Apple, Air BNB, Uber, Tesla – they are all different, each one has a unique position. This unique position is created only by crafting and executing a brilliant strategy.


STRATEGY requires three key principles. Firstly, a strategy needs to create a unique and valuable position through a different set of activities performed by the organisation. Secondly, it requires trade-offs to be made, deciding on what to do and what not to when competing in the market. Lastly, a strategy needs to create a ‘fit’ among the company’s activities.


STRATEGY RELIES ON A DIFFERENT SET OF ACTIVITIES


The best example to illustrate that STRATEGY should rest on a unique set of activities is to study Southwest Airlines, which was the first mover in introducing low-cost air travel to the world.


They realised that people have to travel to one place from another, that most people do not need great food and neither do they opt for the best of wines. All this can be enjoyed when they are not travelling! Instead, people come to an airport to travel – from one place to another – at the cheapest possible fare, to get to their destination on time, at a convenient time, with the best possible connection. Southwest Airlines did all that. They introduced the world to low cost, convenient air travel!


The whole positioning was based on low cost, convenient travel. The world had never thought about this before as air travel was expensive. Very few people would fly because many could not afford it. Also, timings and connections were not convenient.


Southwest saw this as an opportunity and consciously chose a different set of activities to deliver ‘low-cost convenient travel’ to its customers. Southwest selected airports and routes to avoid congestion and worked on rapid gate turnaround, which allowed them to facilitate frequent departures and greater use of aircraft.


Even today, they adopt strict limits on the type and length of routes to make standardised aircraft possible. Facilitating automatic ticketing at the gate, they encourage customers to bypass the travel agents and avoid paying commissions. They also did not offer meals, seat assignment and internal baggage transfers to ensure the cost was low. Of course, this was a challenge for full-service airlines as they could not perform these activities to secure a differentiated positioning. Southwest airline was able to establish a unique low-cost, convenient travel position by performing these activities differently than its competitors.


STRATEGY: IT’S ALL ABOUT TRADE-OFFS


In today’s business world we often witness that most leaders want to do everything, despite knowing full well that we cannot do everything, and we cannot be everything to everybody. It is evident that we can be something to somebody which means some competitive activities are incompatible. Therefore, gains in one area can be achieved only at the expense of others, known as Trade-offs. Business leaders have a pivotal role in understanding this and deciding on trade-offs.


The ideal example to explain trade-offs is Neutrogena, a brand positioned as a medicinal product that delivers the promise ‘kind to the skin’. For instance, unlike other products in the category frame of reference, Neutrogena accomplishes this strategic position preceding manufacturing efficiencies, achieving the desired attributes of its soaps and their marketing strategy looks more like a drug company.


With the strong equity of the brand, it would have been tempting for Neutrogena to look at line extensions as part of its brand architecture to get into fields such as perfumery. But they chose not to. They are very clear in terms of their positioning and are also very clear in terms of STRATEGY. They do not want to blunt this differentiation. Thus, it is about trade-offs.


The Strategy also involves understanding what you are good at – mostly what you are best at – and being unbeatable in that realm and understanding what you do not do equally well.


World-renowned Continental Airlines is an ideal organisation to explain this phenomenon. The Airline manages a very successful full-service airline with good market share. Their flights are mostly long haul with the best of privileges offered to customers.


Based on this success, Continental saw an opportunity to attract the bottom-end traveller by introducing a low-fare airline. The leadership thought, since they were doing well, as a full-service airline, with a strong brand, with the best of people, processes and technology, why not offer a low-cost airline as well.


They also thought if Southwest can do it, they can too. They were of the syndrome like most other leaders, ‘We are good in this, so we can be good in the other one also’. Sadly, the new venture turned into a disaster! It did not work because Continental could not be both. They struggled to be the best full-frilled airline and be the best low-cost airline at the same time!

The Power Of People Is Higher When They Come Together And Support The Leadership And When That Happens In Organisations It Is Immeasurable!

This is not STRATEGY.


STRATEGY is about trade-offs and about being clear on what the business should not be doing.


This is a clear lesson for business leaders today, who most often than not say ‘yes’ to everything that comes by. Their thinking is based on the belief, ‘I have done many things in my career, and hence I can do anything and everything’. Today, leaders want to do everything to please people and do not say no. This kind of thinking is entirely against STRATEGY as STRATEGY is all about occupying a unique position in the minds of the target customers for sustainable competitive advantage. The moment a choice is made to fill a unique position it is not possible to be anywhere else. This is where leaders have to make trade-offs.


CREATING A STRATEGIC FIT


Once leaders decide on a STRATEGY, among the critical roles of leadership is to enlist the entire organisation around this chosen strategic roadmap. Most of the time strategies are created in boardrooms, and its people are not engaged. The strategy has to be simple and remembered to enlist people. The power of people is higher when they come together and support the leadership, and when that happens in organisations it is immeasurable!


Everywhere and in every process – whether in IT systems, Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP), performance evaluations or goal setting – everything should be linked to STRATEGY. This is called creating a strategic fit.


This kind of strategic fit provides direction and links the company activities interdependently with each other with the sole objective of building economic value for all its stakeholders. Fit eliminates imitators by creating a chain that is strong but only as strong as its weakest link.


BIC is a brand that produces low-cost pens to attract low-end customers. The company has achieved this by creating a strategic fit by focusing on the cost drivers across its value chain from low-cost manufacturing processes, product design that emphasises the ease of manufacturing, aggressive purchasing to minimise material cost and in-house parts production.


They introduced the BIC pen, the BIC razors – the disposable razors – and all forms of low-cost consumer products, their target customers could afford. You do not want to carry a BIC pen in your pocket – it is not a ‘self-esteem’ need they were planning to meet. BIC is clear in its brand positioning. They do not want their target customers to use a BIC razor over and over again as it is a disposable razor. But it is attractive to the target segment at the bottom of the pyramid. That is how BIC became the pioneer of disposable technology!


GETTING STRATEGY RIGHT


In today’s hypercompetitive world, businesses are under pressure to grow. Most companies enter different sectors for the sake of achieving growth. With enthusiasm to improve, companies introduce variants, enter new categories or launch products in new markets without a long-term strategic intent. Most often than not the consideration is others – if others have got into it we can do it too, and we also execute it. Companies then become the same as their competitors, and this is not a STRATEGY.


Today most of the organisations do not pick and choose what fits their businesses best, based on their core competencies – processes, people and work culture. Instead, by trying to do many things without selecting the best fit, they end up slashing innovation budgets and cutting marketing expenditure of their core businesses. They even cut training and development which will often lead to strategic failure. Organisations take all these moves without fully understanding their own STRATEGY!

In Short, STRATEGY Is About A Unique Position. STRATEGY Is About Trade-Offs. STRATEGY Is About Creating A Fit In The Organisation. Can You Generate That Fit With The Culture You Have? If The Answer Is No, Do Not Do It.

Today more and more companies work with consultants on crafting strategies, which often prescribe various approaches to STRATEGY – These consultants often opine, ‘Look at your value drivers, look at your key challenges, look at your must-win-battles!’ These models are new to most leaders, and they love these buzz words and embrace them.


Subsequently, leaders ensure the entire organisation fill an endless number of forms. Finally, this results in ‘big book reports’ and not engaging people about the strategy. Soon after, the ‘big book report’ is forgotten. People get into a cycle where they continue to do things as and when they come and in their own way, and life persists unchanged.


Leaders forget to ask themselves whether they have the right STRATEGY. Whether through that STRATEGY they help their businesses to occupy a unique position in the market? When formulating the STRATEGY have leaders been bold enough to make trade-offs? Is the entire company, in terms of structure, activities and commitments aligned with their STRATEGY? If any of the answers are ‘no’ leaders need to rethink. This is the foundation upon which STRATEGY is built.


Leaders need to understand that STRATEGY should be created with a fair and open process by enrolling the right people across the organisation. When leaders get the right STRATEGY with the people on board, the project management techniques of the company also need to come into play to brilliantly execute the STRATEGY. Leaders cannot leave it to executives to oversee the implementation plan.


ROLE OF LEADERSHIP IN EXECUTING A STRATEGY


STRATEGY and leadership need to go hand in hand. Without strong leaders, a plan cannot be crafted or executed. Sometimes organisations have good STRATEGIES, but they cannot be implemented as leaders have not engaged the people in the strategy crafting process. Hence, in today’s business world leadership has become vital than ever before to craft and execute a strategy.


Leaders need to understand what leadership is really about as most leaders often misunderstand their role. They think leadership is only about doing things better as opposed to doing things differently or doing different things. Some even believe leadership is about command and control as opposed to influencing and inspiring people. Leadership is about building self and the team and getting the best out of the group, not about merely getting rid of people.


Leadership intervention is necessary for setting up cross-functional project teams to execute the strategy. Set and track key performance indicators and hold people accountable in terms of sticking to the plan. If leaders do not give STRATEGY execution due importance, their company will be seen as not being serious enough to make the required changes and the sacrifices necessary to execute STRATEGY.


REDISCOVER STRATEGY


We as leaders need to rediscover STRATEGY. To make sure that we have got it right, firstly we need to ask ourselves what the unique position we are trying to build for our organisation is? Secondly, it is about the trade-offs: what is it that we should do, and what is it that we should not. Thirdly, we need to check the pulse of the people and the culture of the company: can we create a fit? Do we have the core competencies?


We cannot be everything we want. We need to choose what we are good at.


STRATEGY is all about deliberately choosing a different set of activities or doing different things.


In short, STRATEGY is about a unique position. STRATEGY is about trade-offs. STRATEGY is about creating a fit in the organisation. Can you generate that fit with the culture you have? If the answer is no, do not do it.

TweetShareShare

Business Today May 2023

Business Today

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

© 2023 BT Options. All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • ISSUES
    • 2006 to 2009
      • 2006
      • 2007
      • 2008
      • 2009
    • 2010 to 2019
      • 2010
      • 2011
      • 2012
      • 2013
      • 2014
      • 2015
      • 2016
      • 2017
      • 2018
      • 2019
    • 2020 to 2023
      • 2020
      • 2021
      • 2022
      • 2023
  • FOR DIGITAL SUBSCRIPTION
  • BT AWARDS
    • BT Top 40 2021 – 2022
  • ABOUT US

© 2023 BT Options. All Rights Reserved

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In